Member since Oct 24, 2011



  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.

Recent Comments

Re: “The Tea Party vs. Occupy Wall Street

For Mr. Jerry....I'd like to give you a little real life fact: The Occupy Wallstreet Movement is AGAINST THE JEWISH FAITH. Don't believe me? Google it...hell, watch this: The idiots in OWS do NOT support the rich in New York...and by their beliefs, say that many are Jewish. supporting those goons in New York who are a part of OWS, you really in fact, supporting those who hate your very religion.

To all those who keep claiming it's all the GOP'S fault, and the Republicans, and the right-wingers....DO. YOUR. RESEARCH. BEFORE. YOU. OPEN. YOUR. TRAP. Read the damn facts people...your ignorance only perpetuates the overall image of your so-called movement...and trust me, there's a reason no one is taking y'all seriously. I'm a conservative and HATE Wallstreet...and GASP, i'm not the only Republican who feels this way....most of us do. The problem isn't at Wallstreet though....why do you think WS is so corrupt?? Thanks to FEDERAL GOV'T BAILOUTS passed by the Democratic party in thanks to Obama. If you wanna go after the root of the real problems....go protest at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington (it's the really big white house with the pretty green lawn...for all your OWS idiots) and at the U.S. Capitol Building...

Bottom-line...The Obama administration is only "supporting" the OWS Movement because Obama and his party know he has NOTHING ELSE to use during his re-election campaign. None of his policies have helped jobs, our economy, or our country in any way what so ever.

Oh...and last time I checked, none of the Tea Party rallies I went to ever had girls shouting while running around TOPLESS, or people urinating in public, or anyone POOPING ON POLICE VEHICLES.

Posted by Natmcg1 on October 24, 2011 at 4:04 PM

Re: “Widow of killed cyclist might sue driver, AT&T

THE DRIVER'S HIT CAUSED THE MAN'S DEATH. End. Of. Story. You commit a crime, you pay the price...I'm sorry if you don't have the money or financials but that's the price you pay when you hit a cyclist and cause his death. I can't believe that 1. The driver was not charged with vehicular homicide and 2. That AT&T were not charged as well...AT&T should be stepping up to help this woman and her family not only because it's the right thing to do, but in addition to protecting their own butts in case the woman's wants to sue...which she SHOULD and WILL WIN.

I'm disgusted to read comments like nofaith's saying boo hoo, it's not fair to sue the driver "because (he) doesn't have nearly the money".....TOO BAD. This kind of jackhole "nofaith" clearly has a skewed mentality of how the judicial system and common moral law DARE you say something like "if this family is destitute they bear some responsibility for not carrying life insurance..." you disgust me. How can you possibly try to place any sort of blame on this poor widow and her grieving family for the terrible loss of their father due to absolute ignorant malice and reckless behavior by an idiot like Rupley.

You commit a pay the price. BOTTOM LINE.

6 of 6 people like this.
Posted by Natmcg1 on October 24, 2011 at 3:31 PM
Classified Listings

Powered by Foundation   © Copyright 2018, Charleston City Paper   RSS