http://www.charlestoncitypaper.com/HaireoftheDog/archives/2013/01/23/in-benghazi-show-trial-hillary-clinton-must-atone-for-george-bushs-sins Comments On: In Benghazi show trial, Hillary Clinton must atone for George Bush's sins by Chris Haire en-us Copyright 2013 Charleston City Paper. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Charleston City Paper readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Charleston City Paper. webmaster@charlestoncitypaper.com (Charleston City Paper Webmaster) Thu, 23 May 2013 00:00:01 -0400 Thu, 23 May 2013 02:45:00 -0400 Foundation http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Posted by landsnark]]> Sat, 11 May 2013 10:27:34 -0400 Charleston City Paper Posted by artrogue]]> Sat, 11 May 2013 09:57:35 -0400 Charleston City Paper Posted by landsnark]]> Fri, 10 May 2013 19:43:34 -0400 Charleston City Paper From ABC:
When it became clear last fall that the CIA’s now discredited Benghazi talking points were flawed, the White House said repeatedly the documents were put together almost entirely by the intelligence community, but White House documents reviewed by Congress suggest a different story.
ABC News has obtained 12 different versions of the talking points that show they were extensively edited as they evolved from the drafts first written entirely by the CIA to the final version distributed to Congress and to U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice before she appeared on five talk shows the Sunday after that attack.
White House emails reviewed by ABC News suggest the edits were made with extensive input from the State Department.
The edits included requests from the State Department that references to the Al Qaeda-affiliated group Ansar al-Sharia be deleted as well references to CIA warnings about terrorist threats in Benghazi in the months preceding the attack.

So much for it bein just a right wing Ails conspiracy.

Everyday something new comes out..this is a mess.

Hicks did what he thought he had to do to try to keep his job.
Posted by artrogue]]> Fri, 10 May 2013 18:44:29 -0400 Charleston City Paper Posted by landsnark]]> Thu, 09 May 2013 23:35:38 -0400 Charleston City Paper Posted by artrogue]]> Thu, 09 May 2013 18:30:28 -0400 Charleston City Paper Hicks said there was no demonstration and that top State Department officials had been told that, and he told the committee he was "stunned" and "embarrassed" by Rice's televised account.
Boehner tried to take a less confrontational tone on Thursday, but nonetheless said the White House was refusing to make public e-mails and other documents he says show the political calculation behind the Rice TV appearance and other elements of the administration's Benghazi response.
"The White House continues to claim it only made stylistic changes to talking points used by Susan Rice, ignoring the fact that senior White House officials directed the changes being made" to those talking points, Boehner said.
There seems to be a lot more that is going to come out, and evidence was withheld.
I really would just like to see us get it all out in the light.
If it is all just an Ails concocation that will come out too and Republicans will look ridiculous.
Something smells really rotten here.
As a teenager i watched the watergate hearings, I couldn't wait to see Nixon get his.
Posted by artrogue]]> Thu, 09 May 2013 18:25:29 -0400 Charleston City Paper Posted by landsnark]]> Thu, 09 May 2013 18:08:36 -0400 Charleston City Paper Posted by artrogue]]> Thu, 09 May 2013 17:36:29 -0400 Charleston City Paper So, seeing as how you're an expert, could you please elucidate your lingering concerns regarding Benghazi that weren't addressed in the report produced by the Accountability Review Board, the Congressional hearing convened by Republicans (as mentioned in the article above), and disclosure of all defense, military and intelligence emails post-event?

Do you know who Roger Ailes is, and what his agenda and tactics are? Say anything enough, assert its truth despite all contrary facts, pick apart peripheral minutiae, and it becomes the truth in the minds of the gullible.
Posted by landsnark]]> Thu, 09 May 2013 08:20:34 -0400 Charleston City Paper and t dog77 it doesnt matter if he was an ambassador or a soldier an american died if you lost someone in the war youd think you would get that point more then anyone
Posted by Jacob Frye]]> Thu, 09 May 2013 03:07:58 -0400 Charleston City Paper Posted by artrogue]]> Tue, 07 May 2013 00:13:33 -0400 Charleston City Paper Posted by mat catastrophe]]> Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:26:37 -0500 Charleston City Paper You condemn Hillary for Benghazi, as a proxy for condemning Obama, yet the gigantic failings of your beloved one in the 80s are beyond reproach. Why is that?

Stand Reagan's failings in my post against gfryesc's hysterical spittle-flecked rant regarding hypocrisy and Obama.
Posted by landsnark]]> Tue, 05 Feb 2013 18:22:59 -0500 Charleston City Paper Posted by artrogue]]> Tue, 05 Feb 2013 17:44:22 -0500 Charleston City Paper http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/02/n….
Posted by Ron Liberte]]> Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:10:43 -0500 Charleston City Paper Posted by Paulius]]> Tue, 05 Feb 2013 12:58:11 -0500 Charleston City Paper
Good times.
Posted by mat catastrophe]]> Tue, 05 Feb 2013 12:21:34 -0500 Charleston City Paper Posted by CID99]]> Tue, 05 Feb 2013 12:03:57 -0500 Charleston City Paper Posted by landsnark]]> Mon, 04 Feb 2013 13:41:06 -0500 Charleston City Paper Posted by Ron Liberte]]> Mon, 04 Feb 2013 12:16:27 -0500 Charleston City Paper Posted by CID99]]> Mon, 04 Feb 2013 11:49:49 -0500 Charleston City Paper Posted by Paulius]]> Mon, 04 Feb 2013 11:09:26 -0500 Charleston City Paper Posted by Sark]]> Mon, 04 Feb 2013 09:41:22 -0500 Charleston City Paper
I'm also not anyone else. Or everyone.
Posted by mat catastrophe]]> Sun, 03 Feb 2013 23:23:24 -0500 Charleston City Paper