http://www.charlestoncitypaper.com/charleston/is-this-the-rnc-or-the-wwe/Content?oid=4157773 Comments On: Is this the RNC or the WWE? by Jack Hunter en-us Copyright 2013 Charleston City Paper. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Charleston City Paper readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Charleston City Paper. webmaster@charlestoncitypaper.com (Charleston City Paper Webmaster) Tue, 21 May 2013 00:00:01 -0400 Tue, 21 May 2013 10:30:00 -0400 Foundation http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Posted by mat catastrophe]]> Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:08:20 -0400 Charleston City Paper Posted by Paulius]]> Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:26:11 -0400 Charleston City Paper
Leech. Taker.

I bet you vote for Obama.

Posted by mat catastrophe]]> Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:10:09 -0400 Charleston City Paper Posted by Paulius]]> Tue, 18 Sep 2012 01:37:23 -0400 Charleston City Paper Posted by Ron Liberte]]> Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:00:06 -0400 Charleston City Paper Posted by Ron Liberte]]> Mon, 17 Sep 2012 12:50:42 -0400 Charleston City Paper
So you have some other bizarre justification for wanting to control the decisions a woman makes about her body?

"Also, I read your blog on "libertarian" bloggers. I don't understand why you think that in order to be a libertarian, one has to rely on himself to create all he uses rather than having those things provided for him by the free market.
Posted by mat catastrophe]]> Mon, 17 Sep 2012 07:08:47 -0400 Charleston City Paper
"But to say that someone who believes in limited government, non-intervention, civil liberties and a free market is an anti-establishment candidate is nonsense. Those people used to be called Republicans, or conservatives, until the party became hijacked by bible thumpers and teahadists."

You see that you just explained why Ron Paul is anti-establishment within today's Republican Party, right?

"And, what more proof do you need that he doesn't have a firm grasp of his cognitive functions than the fact he is a climate change denier?"
Posted by Paulius]]> Mon, 17 Sep 2012 04:30:24 -0400 Charleston City Paper Posted by Mona]]> Mon, 17 Sep 2012 00:19:03 -0400 Charleston City Paper
Wanna know where I stopped reading this comment?
Posted by mat catastrophe]]> Sat, 15 Sep 2012 22:01:12 -0400 Charleston City Paper Posted by FCB]]> Sat, 15 Sep 2012 21:23:10 -0400 Charleston City Paper Posted by Matthew Doarnberger]]> Sat, 15 Sep 2012 16:41:46 -0400 Charleston City Paper Posted by Ron Liberte]]> Fri, 14 Sep 2012 23:51:16 -0400 Charleston City Paper Posted by John Paul Jah]]> Fri, 14 Sep 2012 23:33:50 -0400 Charleston City Paper
Where they would likely be put to a vote and banned. That's not libertarian.
Posted by mat catastrophe]]> Fri, 14 Sep 2012 19:42:55 -0400 Charleston City Paper Posted by Matthew Doarnberger]]> Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:47:40 -0400 Charleston City Paper Posted by Ron Liberte]]> Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:35:51 -0400 Charleston City Paper
And as for implying RP is a hypocrite for serving in Congress, you see your failure in logic there, right? It's not as if he joined Congress to be wined and dined by lobbyists.
Posted by Paulius]]> Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:55:26 -0400 Charleston City Paper Posted by heresyarch]]> Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:45:39 -0400 Charleston City Paper Posted by Ron Liberte]]> Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:01:29 -0400 Charleston City Paper Posted by Paulius]]> Fri, 14 Sep 2012 01:17:08 -0400 Charleston City Paper Posted by Ron Liberte]]> Thu, 13 Sep 2012 12:15:11 -0400 Charleston City Paper Posted by cbedenbaugh]]> Thu, 13 Sep 2012 11:39:31 -0400 Charleston City Paper