What are the bases for these charges? References or citations to any research would be helpful to substantiate very dubious analysis. Anyone who opposes big government, does so in great part because of the incestuous relationship with big business.
"During the Reagan years, Washington cut funding to many regulatory agencies, and as a result they were unable to perform their legal duties adequately. Under George W. Bush it got worse. Many regulatory agencies simply became extensions of the corporations they were supposed to be overseeing."
If Mrs. Busch would stop hiding and would communicate with the First District voters, we wouldn't need to guess, theorize, and surmise who she is and what she thinks. We could have a meaningful and substantive dialogue about the issues, but a one-sided conversation is a monologue.
Good job, Joel, bringing the article around to a full circle. I empathize, Frankus. Great guys. Great band.
Half the country voted for Romney. That is hardly irrelevant. The abandonment and consequent murders of the ambassador and security team in Benghazi is a shameful outrage. "After 9/11, not a single government official lost their job. Instead, they were given medals. No one has accepted responsibility for the Benghazi tragedy. This is unacceptable. Congressman [Jeff] Duncan and I are demanding that we get to the bottom of what really happened," said Rand Paul, who is determined to show that what really happened does make a difference. The Obama administration, including Sec. Clinton, has yet to actually take responsibility. Despite some valid points in the body of the article, the introduction and final paragraph are the strongest proof that this opinion is based not on facts but loose conjecture from an uninformed bias. This is what happens when people live in an unintellectual bubble.
Good research, Paul. Your political caveats read like acquiescence to the paper's editorial staff and owners.
All Comments »
Powered by Foundation
© Copyright 2013,
Charleston City Paper