Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, White countries for everyone?
Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY White country and ONLY into White countries.
The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.
Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY White country and ONLY White countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-Whites.
What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-Blacks were brought into EVERY Black country and ONLY into Black countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?
And how long would it take any sane Black man to notice this and what kind of psycho Black man wouldn't object to this?
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the White race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-White.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.
Let me try that again- no Republican could have won at that point, but anybody running as a Democrat would have.
Artrogue, I was responding to Showmoor's post about Obama only being elected in the first place because he is black.
My point was, no Republican, or any Democrat would have won at that point.
The part I find most interesting is the long gap between the failed return (Apr 9) date and the report of it being stolen (May 21).
In addition to the aforementioned salmon colored shorts and ubiquitous boat shoes, may I also visualize the multiplicity of sunglasses-not-worn-at-night display methods?
I suggested you do your own research. - Artrogue
You bear the burden of justifying your claim. Whether you cannot or simply choose not to attempt it, the effect is the same; the unsubstantiated boasting of a conservative fanboy.
FCB, come on time to face the facts. I have always thought your reasonable enough to discuss issues.
I've posted numerous times how we got where we are. It is not only a bush thing. Besides..after 5 years its about time someone took responsibility for where we are now. How long are people going to suffer and fingers get pointed at Bush?
This is the Obama economy.
More likely, after the 8 ruinous Bush years, the Democrats could have run anybody, even Mat Catastrophe, and still won.
It'll be a great place to escape the crowd, along with the crowd of other people escaping the crowd.
What the left refuses to accept is the fact that if Obama was all white he would never have been elected president. No one would have elected a little known second term senator from Chicago to be president. That, in itself, is pure racism.
Good job reading right through my post.
I can name plenty that he has done.
Duh, i'm a conservative.
I suggested you do your own research. Your mostly a liberal, so of course your going to disagree. He is representing the majority that elected him to the house and since he was nominated to the senate has continued to do so.
If you don't like it, work hard to get a democrat elected next time.
Its a republic not a democracy.
Your use of the word token is disgraceful.
"The reaction to the naming of Rep. Tim Scott (R-S.C.) to the U.S. Senate compared to Barack Obama entering the Senate and subsequent appointment of Roland Burris to the body four years ago is an interesting and revealing study in contrasts — and hypocrisy.
When the Democrats have a black man in the Senate, they make him president in about 10 minutes, the left calls him “savior,” bestows the Nobel Peace Prize on him, names him Time magazine’s “Person of the Year” and shrilly tags those who disagree with him as “racists” and other ugly invectives.
When Republicans put a black man in the Senate, the media ignore it, or the left proceeds to question his “credibility” as an African-American. An op-ed published in The New York Times refers to Scott as a “cynical token” of the GOP, despite the fact that his fiscally conservative record mirrors those of his predecessor and the governor who appointed him, as well as his South Carolina constituency.
It further pontificates that Scott will not represent African-Americans while in the Senate, even though South Carolina has a large black population and Scott said he represents all of his constituents."
All this newspaper coverage is overdramatization and sensationalism. Folly is still a great place to live with wonderful people and total lack of pretention. Joel Flores said to me one night in "The Dolla": "Folly Beach is the only place I've ever been where eccentricity is not only tolerated, it's encouraged." I couldn't agree with him more.
Lol, Way to hit 'em with the old switcheroo Fish; it does appear the local reps are only fanatical about other people's family values.
Suh, obviously you don't care much for the white man's language either.
Oh dear Gentle Readers, we're in the South - let us forget our manners to those who trespass and involve themselves in private personal matters. Just throw some hot grease in the general direction of the perpetrator who's trespassing on your property. Most Southern households have some grease on the stove and if not, break out the Crisco or the Wesson Oil! 8-)
So if you catch someone screwing with your vehicle you go home and threaten him on the internet?
I hate to think of what you would do to someone breaking into your house.
"This is especially true when he votes no on everything. The nation would be in the exact same situation without any representatives at all. We could teach a chicken to cast a no vote. A brilliant congressman writes and sponsors legislation that gets enacted and becomes law. A brilliant Senator convinces a majority of his colleagues of the importance of the his ideas."
Fish, I wonder if you'd feel the same way if it was the Republican Party being obstructed by Democrat no votes and filibusters. At the federal level, a no vote is right more often than it's not. That goes for everything from the war in Iraq to Obamacare to anything else that increases the federal scope.
That question should be asked of Tim Scott. Why doesn't he have a wife and children? Not that I have a problem with his lifestyle, he just seems hypocritical. But of course the same could be asked of our other Republican Senator as well. The family values hypocrisy of our newly elected Republican Congressman is of course already well documented.
Is Ok, I agree with him 100%... I don't understand why people get offended when these jonny came lately say something "racist." I expect for these unmelanated people to say trash all the time, is about time I hear something that makes sense from these people. I personally don't want to pollute my powerful Black genes with white recessive genes, is already a little white washed. My kids are going to be blacker than me. Having a lighter skin child will actually be a curse for my lineage, I don't want more weak criminal cave ancestors following my child. Hell no!
Re: “The SPLC's gender assignment case comes down to civil rights”
Hey Joe, where u going with that gun in your hand? Those are a lot of opinions, but as far as facts go I'm fairly certain that:"The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan" is a false statement.
Additionally, Jimi Hendrix' music is still awesome.