Cid95 - Thanks. I transposed that statement to be two weeks prior to the shooting, not after the shooting. Thank you for pointing out my error.
I'm sure that if this POS had his way he would be wearing a white hood and and an old bed sheet.
His courthouse antics aren't going to get any higher court to overturn his conviction and save him from the death house after massacring nine people and confessing it on tape. That argument might fly in Massachusetts, not South Carolina.
While I agree from the evidence I've seen, Officer Slager is, at the very least, guilty of manslaughter, neither I nor Mr. Green are jurors in the case and his broad generalization about the criminal justice system are just that, a broad generalization.
Mistrials are actually not unusual in cases like this regardless of the color of the officer or the victim, and so before we start condemning the whole system because it didn't go our way, take a breath. Officer Slager was not found not guilty, there will be a retrial, and more than likely he will be convicted. I wonder if that occurs whether Mr. Green will return to write an OP that the criminal justice system worked the way if was suppose to.
This is the system we have and if Mr. Green would like to suggest another, I'm sure we would all like to hear it.
Trumps focusing "Greatly, YUUUgely, Greatly" on our nation. Good for him.
The State Department still has not fully disclosed all the subpoenaed documents and the President has still not disclosed what he was doing the night of the attack! Susan Rice was replaced and given a National Security adviser position to protect her Political silence.... Just saying!
Because the FBI background check denial happened about two weeks after the shooting:
"Less than two weeks after the shooting, Thrailkill finally received a response regarding Roofs background check, informing him to deny the sale."
The NICS check process needs to be tightened up and made effective, as per current law. Of course, someone willing to commit mass murder is probably also willing to illegally acquire a firearm, as we've repeatedly seen in Europe.
@Jshicke: because, hey, what's the worst that could happen? Oh, nevermind.
At this point I'd be happy with the "gun control" idea of merely enforcing existing law.
And still no Snapchat or Instagram category under Culture, Art, and Entertainment.
Trump is going to change the international landscape in a way to benefit him and his family. That's why so chummy with Putin and genocidal Duterte (Philippines). When he makes friends with the enemy, he makes himself richer and creates a yuge security risk for the US.
Nah. It was a $7.8 million smear campaign, not an investigation, so it DOES really sound that bad.
A $1 million project involving monkeys on a treadmill, another $1.2 million to assess the effects of microgravity on sheep, $110 million spent on constructing buildings left empty in Afghanistan, $300,000 for a cheese heritage center, $5 billion for unneeded data centers. $2 million for jazz playing robots. $1.3 million to investigate how a foam koozie keeps a can of cold beer cool on a hot day. $2 million each to train 145 Syrian 'Freedom Fighters' of whom only 96 actually fought. The Pentagon does say it was less than that though because most of the equipment purchased for the training was never used.
$7.8 million for an investigation doesn't sound that bad, really.
You, sir, are awesome.
And the beat goes on:
FINALLY, after 7 years of it, no more Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi. Mission accomplished but still nothing to "nail" HRC to the wall in the end. Why? Because it was only a 7-year smear campaign, that cost taxpayers millions of dollars and 7 years of wasted legislative time. Oh, wait a minute, it was not wasted because HRC lost, right? So in the end, political posturing cost taxpayers millions in order to participate in campaign election tampering.
Check again :) Thanks for the suggestion.
And still no podcasting category under Culture, Art, and Entertainment.
It does make me wonder why, since a month went by after he purchased the pistol and then went on his shooting spree, did police not go to his home to get the pistol back seeing as how he apparently lied on the form when he made the purchase and was now illegally in possession of a firearm.
"Slager used his Taser to directly stun Scott twice one in the side, once in the back.
In all, Slager pulled the Tasers trigger six times during a 67-second span that morning, data from the device indicated."
This is nonsense.
When a taser is fired two darts are launched from the cartridge, each trailing a wire. It doesn't matter how often you pull the trigger after that -- until another cartridge is loaded the weapon won't fire.
The video shows only two wires and one cartridge, one wire to a dart in Slager's chest are and one to near Slager's left shin. The cartridge goes bouncing behind Slager as Scott breaks free. There are no darts in Scott.
... oh, and Michael Slager OUGHT TO be found NOT guilty in the murder of Walter Scott. Slager ought to be found guilty of some level of manslaughter (per SCOTUS in Garner), but murder is an absurd overcharge.
So a white man who gets shot running from police is not racist, but a black man who gets shot running is?
He must object to being tried in prison garb and then still be forced to wear the prison garb in order to claim his rights have been violated.
Powered by Foundation
© Copyright 2017,
Charleston City Paper