Those who would pervert this great and blessed institution of marriage bring an affront to the heavenly Father, the Lord Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit because they have perverted the meaning of the Word of God. Do we not see why such actions are so abominable? Adam typified Christ who laid down His life or “fell asleep” to bring forth His bride. Eve came forth as a result of Adam’s obedience to the Word of God. This idea, though expressed here briefly, was perhaps the main reason for the institution of marriage. It is a portrayal of the finished work of Christ who looks with satisfaction upon His finished work and even now prepares to call His bride unto Himself..
What are the reasons for the desires of same-sex marriage?
This is briefly defined in our opening verse of Scripture: “...yea, they have chosen their own ways, and their soul delighteth in their abominations” (Isa. 66:3). Again, “Who knowing the judgment of God , that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them” (Rom. 1:32). They have chosen their way, their delights and their abominations. Their aim is to proselytize others to themselves that they may “have pleasure in them that do them.” This is part of the self-will, self-esteem crowd that would dictate to all of us. Beloved, be not deceived, the Sodomites have money, intellect, influence and power. Proof of this is constantly seen in the media publicity, TV sitcoms, etc., that foster their agenda. If freedom of speech and of the press were censored, as it once was for moral standards, perhaps much of this sin sickness would go away or at least from public eyes and ears. Many Sodomites run Hollywood, many of the TV networks, and we must not forget Disneyland/World. Their goal is to corrupt our children and our nation with the guise of “no more intolerance, no more hate speech, and freedom of expression.” Their main objective is to do away with the Bible and Christianity; to do away with moral and legal standards without which no nation can continue to exist as a free people. In short, the Sodomites want to establish ‘their own ways,” their so-called “Gay agenda,” their idea of a one world order that they may be free of moral restraint.
We ask again, Why same-sex marriages? The Sodomites are in love with their sin and themselves. This is their god that they will not forsake. It is always open rebellion against God and His Word. Proof of this lies in the fact that the Sodomites despise and mock the institution of marriage. They make mockery of it to satisfy their own ego and perversions: “Their soul delighteth in their abominations.” It is a me attitude. Nothing else matters to them but their world and how they can so arrange it to suit themselves. They have the ear of the media, the courts, and now have contaminated our government. Our “representatives” have bought into it and think that Sodomy laws are antiquated and need to be done away with. Where, oh where, is our national shame! Where is the humbling of ourselves before God because we have allowed such wickedness in the lands? Can it also be said of this nation that “their soul delighteth in their abominations”? Yea, they will not have the Word of God to prick their conscience, and though the Lord sent upon
Hey Joe, where u going with that gun in your hand? Those are a lot of opinions, but as far as facts go I'm fairly certain that:"The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan" is a false statement.
Additionally, Jimi Hendrix' music is still awesome.
Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, White countries for everyone?
Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY White country and ONLY into White countries.
The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.
Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY White country and ONLY White countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-Whites.
What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-Blacks were brought into EVERY Black country and ONLY into Black countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?
And how long would it take any sane Black man to notice this and what kind of psycho Black man wouldn't object to this?
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the White race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-White.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.
Let me try that again- no Republican could have won at that point, but anybody running as a Democrat would have.
Artrogue, I was responding to Showmoor's post about Obama only being elected in the first place because he is black.
My point was, no Republican, or any Democrat would have won at that point.
The part I find most interesting is the long gap between the failed return (Apr 9) date and the report of it being stolen (May 21).
In addition to the aforementioned salmon colored shorts and ubiquitous boat shoes, may I also visualize the multiplicity of sunglasses-not-worn-at-night display methods?
I suggested you do your own research. - Artrogue
You bear the burden of justifying your claim. Whether you cannot or simply choose not to attempt it, the effect is the same; the unsubstantiated boasting of a conservative fanboy.
FCB, come on time to face the facts. I have always thought your reasonable enough to discuss issues.
I've posted numerous times how we got where we are. It is not only a bush thing. Besides..after 5 years its about time someone took responsibility for where we are now. How long are people going to suffer and fingers get pointed at Bush?
This is the Obama economy.
More likely, after the 8 ruinous Bush years, the Democrats could have run anybody, even Mat Catastrophe, and still won.
It'll be a great place to escape the crowd, along with the crowd of other people escaping the crowd.
What the left refuses to accept is the fact that if Obama was all white he would never have been elected president. No one would have elected a little known second term senator from Chicago to be president. That, in itself, is pure racism.
Good job reading right through my post.
I can name plenty that he has done.
Duh, i'm a conservative.
I suggested you do your own research. Your mostly a liberal, so of course your going to disagree. He is representing the majority that elected him to the house and since he was nominated to the senate has continued to do so.
If you don't like it, work hard to get a democrat elected next time.
Its a republic not a democracy.
Your use of the word token is disgraceful.
"The reaction to the naming of Rep. Tim Scott (R-S.C.) to the U.S. Senate compared to Barack Obama entering the Senate and subsequent appointment of Roland Burris to the body four years ago is an interesting and revealing study in contrasts — and hypocrisy.
When the Democrats have a black man in the Senate, they make him president in about 10 minutes, the left calls him “savior,” bestows the Nobel Peace Prize on him, names him Time magazine’s “Person of the Year” and shrilly tags those who disagree with him as “racists” and other ugly invectives.
When Republicans put a black man in the Senate, the media ignore it, or the left proceeds to question his “credibility” as an African-American. An op-ed published in The New York Times refers to Scott as a “cynical token” of the GOP, despite the fact that his fiscally conservative record mirrors those of his predecessor and the governor who appointed him, as well as his South Carolina constituency.
It further pontificates that Scott will not represent African-Americans while in the Senate, even though South Carolina has a large black population and Scott said he represents all of his constituents."
All this newspaper coverage is overdramatization and sensationalism. Folly is still a great place to live with wonderful people and total lack of pretention. Joel Flores said to me one night in "The Dolla": "Folly Beach is the only place I've ever been where eccentricity is not only tolerated, it's encouraged." I couldn't agree with him more.
Lol, Way to hit 'em with the old switcheroo Fish; it does appear the local reps are only fanatical about other people's family values.
Suh, obviously you don't care much for the white man's language either.
Oh dear Gentle Readers, we're in the South - let us forget our manners to those who trespass and involve themselves in private personal matters. Just throw some hot grease in the general direction of the perpetrator who's trespassing on your property. Most Southern households have some grease on the stove and if not, break out the Crisco or the Wesson Oil! 8-)
So if you catch someone screwing with your vehicle you go home and threaten him on the internet?
I hate to think of what you would do to someone breaking into your house.
"This is especially true when he votes no on everything. The nation would be in the exact same situation without any representatives at all. We could teach a chicken to cast a no vote. A brilliant congressman writes and sponsors legislation that gets enacted and becomes law. A brilliant Senator convinces a majority of his colleagues of the importance of the his ideas."
Fish, I wonder if you'd feel the same way if it was the Republican Party being obstructed by Democrat no votes and filibusters. At the federal level, a no vote is right more often than it's not. That goes for everything from the war in Iraq to Obamacare to anything else that increases the federal scope.
That question should be asked of Tim Scott. Why doesn't he have a wife and children? Not that I have a problem with his lifestyle, he just seems hypocritical. But of course the same could be asked of our other Republican Senator as well. The family values hypocrisy of our newly elected Republican Congressman is of course already well documented.
Powered by Foundation
© Copyright 2013,
Charleston City Paper