Thomas Dixon is a once in a lifetime candidate who would be real medicine for the ills which plague society and our legislative branch.
Forget the e-mails, the FBI needs to investigate Hillary for committing a murder on live TV.
Lots of pro carriage tour people in this thread, which is kind of funny. The people who keep utilizing this industry are the obnoxious fat-ass tourists wearing chunky white New Balances and cargo shorts who hail from Ohio and that in literally every other circumstance, everyone claims to loathe.
Well said. I am very impressed with Pastor Dixon. He really listens, speaks very well on the issues I hold dear, is fearless. It takes so much courage for a good man or woman to run for office. He has studied all the issues well. He is a must for our state and nation. He has worked hard for this opportunity to serve! Lets give him that opportunity.
Could not agree more. Carriages were charming at first, now they are a major headache for residents (and have been for years), and MANY tourists as well find the sight of these horses groaning under the weight of too many people an absolutely deplorable sight. They cause traffic problems and it's cruel and harms the reputation of our city---why on earth would we continue them? And as to those who think losing a hoof is nothing: what about the many carriage horses that have been gravely injured over the years, and had to be put down? What about the resident who was killed in a carriage accident several years ago, and the many others who've been injured? The cars that have been totaled? Is it worth it? Not to these victims.
Wow!!! Here's you're point...I think....with change comes change. I love the horse drawn carriages! But YOU through THIS piece you wrote opened my mind and my heart allowing me to ask myself the question....if the goal is touring and nostalgia both of which I love, is there an alternative other than more cars...of course there is! So thanks for your article, I get it! Let's invite the city's leaders to consider new possiblities while honoring the past...something done pretty well here😊 One last thing...consider referring to the Red Sox as opposed to that other team....yea.....I know....Deb
I couldn't agree with your assessment of Thomas Dixon more. I have had the privilege of meeting him and getting to know him this past year, and I know without a doubt that he is an authentic man who is knows what it is like to try to live, work, and raise a family in SC. This is a man who will not forget us when he gets to Washington!
Stegelin's cartoon is not only racist but it is also very stupid.
The problem we in the carriage industry face is that those that seek to end our industry don't know the facts nor do they care to. They believe that feelings equate fact and that's simply not true. You may feel that you are doing something positive by ending the carriage industry but the reality is that you are dooming the animals you claim to be fighting for.
We rescue them from auction and provide them with a second career. These animals are not considered adoptable and are born and raised to be working animals. When you remove them from a work environment you place them in a bad situation. What do you think will happen to these animals when the industry is no longer allowed to care for them? Slaughter houses in Canada and Mexico love draft horses and mules because they have more meat on them. They attend the same auctions we do. If you remove the animals from our care they will likely end up back at auction without us to save them.
There has also never been a heat related incident or death in Charleston. We monitor the animal's internal temp after every tour and react to any elevation in temp. People fail to realize that what would be considered "heavy" for you and I to move is not heavy for a draft horse or draft mule. Also learn what friction coefficient is and how it reduces the effect of the weight on a carriage with wheels.
Concerning traffic in Charleston; carriages are not the problem. Impatient and rude vehicle operators who think their timeline is more important than pedestrian and equine safety are the problem. They speed through town, cut corners turning onto road and into alleys, and honk the horn at anyone that slows them down. They are dangerous not the 3mph carriage.
Thank you Mr. Cohen for your article. You are correct, it's time for a change, it's time to evolve and decide which options work best for everyone. Walking tours,PediCabs, electric cars and maybe even a dedicated Horse Park. There are several solid options. The Post & Courier poll indicated that 60% of the people who took the poll wanted to ban the Carriages completely and 37% were not in favor of a ban. I wonder if the 60% who wanted a ban would be willing to compromise? Your words "gimmick" and "bush league" are very descriptive and it does feel that way when I see the daily Carriage tours. Historically speaking, when a society begins to shift it's views on an issue with injustice or other emotional concerns at it's core, there is no turning back. Resistance is to be expected, but it doesn't last forever because one person at a time starts to question the status quo and somewhere in that process they are educated and make their own choice. With a casual "search" I can count 200,000 people across the world who are calling for a stop to the Carriage Tour gimmick. Their signatures and comments come from every corner of the planet. Will those 200,000 people still want to come visit Charleston if they are uncomfortable with the perceived "exploitation" of the horses? I support your article.
And by the way, carriage tours were here long before 1972. Ask Joe Riley. So about the only "fact" in your article is wrong. I would say you should leave the writing to writers. You clearly don't have the chops for it.
The New York Times is a biased rag. And who you calling lowest common denominator beeyotch.
Hitler was a madman who thought exterminating an entire race was sound thinking.
Trump is a visionary and a catalyst for change we need a position of strength in America .
Obama goes to China and they dont even roll out a set of steps for Air Force One? he has to take the rear emergency exit? The president of the Philippines call him a" son of a whore"/?
That is how we get respected internationally?
He may not be a polished politician but bet your ass they will be respectful .
" Speak softly and carry a big stick" Teddy Roosevelt
"The tree of liberty must sometimes be watered with the blood of patriots and tyrants"
"Make America great again" Donald Trump
These are all bold statements flush with controversy.
There are a lot of things i wish were different about Trump as a former soldier i believe hes the best choice.
Please people not Hillary anything but Hillary.
Wow. How did your editor approve this tripe? We've become the darling of the world, so let's get rid of everything that made Charleston a success? Did you even bother to visit one of the stables? Did you do any research on the capacity of horse rescues? Did you bother to read the recent articles on the 44,000 horses that will be slaughtered by the BLM? I would guess that you are just trying to get into the pants of some pale vegan chick and you thought this might seal the deal. What a self-righteous pile of garbage.
If it wasnt so true it would be funny
While i believe this writer is a douche whose total exposure to horses probably consists of rides on the electronic ones in front of kmarts there is a valid concern.
I own horses and have for many years and i am familiar with the anatomical design
of a hoof. If in fact that "Hoof" was bleeding then that animal has a real injury hoofs don't bleed unless they have lost a huge chunk of it. (liken it to breaking a nail as opposed to ripping one out from the nail bed)
If that's the case then that animal will require months of care on that foot and lots of pasture rest.More likely the shoe tore off and the horse stepped on it puncturing the area known as the frog with the nails used to secure it to the hoof. Still a bad thing but not as bad.
The former may indicate pour nutrition or sloppy farrier work, the latter is an unfortunate accident that comes with owning a horse that must be shod.
Regardless if it isn't already a daily part of the caregivers routine it should be implemented as policy and procedure to check the hooves daily by someone who understands what they are looking at. That requires some training as it not as easy as it sounds. You can get the shit kicked out of you if you don't pay attention. So its easy in the heat of summer to want to overlook this but as the saying goes "no hoof no horse"
Ii Believe that these animals are loved and respected by the owners and caregivers two of which (owners) i know personally. They are dedicated to proper care of these animals without which they would be defunct.
Its expensive, its labor and time consuming but its super rewarding to be their friends(the horse). Industry people know this to be true. That is why they do it, why else would you own a 1500 lb animal that generates as much as thirty lbs of poop and 5 gals. of urine a day. lol
In summary i feel badly for the horse but closing down an industry over an unfortunate accident is as stupid as implying the owners of these animals don't care about there welfare.
(i do however believe that they should not use these animals in the intense summer heat, emphasis on intense)
About baseball teams and "gimmicks" - wouldn't it be nice, though, if a major league team did keep some of those community-oriented activities for their fans? Having dog night or 10 cent beer night may be done to draw in people, but that does not mean they are meaningless gimmicks that everyone is better off without after the team grows. They are good in themselves, giving the team personality and creating a connection between the team and its fans. Sure, the major league team may be able to stop doing these things and just "sell out every night all season long" - but is that the point? To just sell out? I don't think Charleston will last if we say, well, we've made it to the top, and that's all that matters. As long as we have tons of tourists flowing in and paying us their money, what else could matter? That's just not Charleston. The carriages have long contributed to the personality of our city and helped to tell our story. They are not a "gimmick" any more than our good food or our beautiful buildings or our hospitality are - they are our way to encourage visitors to take a step back, slow down, enjoy our city, and get to know it.
As for the animals, you recommend we "remove" them from Charleston so they can be saved from car fumes, heat, and weight, and so we can find parking spots quicker. Remove the horses and mules? What happens to them? We do not breed these animals for use in the industry - they are purchased later in life and enabled to work (only 152 days per year on average at Palmetto Carriage, I might add) for ample food, safe housing, incredible medical care, and a whole lot of loving. The saying goes that you don't throw the baby out with the bathwater - that is easier said than done when it comes to horses and mules. An important question to ask, then, is why throw out the bathwater at all if it isn't even dirty? I'm just saying, if the water's going to be thrown out, it had better be dirty and you had better have some clean water to fill the tub again.
We in the carriage industry are not just "worried about [our] jobs and businesses" - we also worry about the animals' welfare, about Charleston's history and ensuring it is kept alive, about our city's millions of visitors, about our way of life. Our horses, stables, and carriages are not just "overhead" to us. They are our coworkers, our home, and our tools. You can keep your air conditioning and your 150 horsepower - we'll stick to coastal breezes and 1 or 2 horse and mule power as long as we can.
if it wasnt so fucked up it would be funny.
Too add to the already many great rThe "author" is very much comparing apples to oranges with the comparison of Charleston to Ghettysburg. Ghettysburg battle field is just that... It's a large open loosely defined area with more space than there is stuff to look at. Monuments here and there, but so spread out a vehicle makes sense. Downtown Charleston, densely populated, small streets, the last thing needed are more cars... Let's say, you replace each carriage in the city with the approximate number of cars needed to accommodate the number of people going out on the carriages. One carriage holds the capacity to carry 16 adults plus 1 driver. In my experience (a decade of it in the industry) on average the carriages carry 13adults and 2 kids+1 tour guide which equals 16 people. (Of course those numbers fluctuate but for the sake of the argument...) at 15 guests, that would break down to a private setting with 2 sedans: 4 guests and a guide and a small van :7 guests and a guide. That means 3 vehicles for every carriage you take out. Given we have between the 5 companies a minimum of 35 carriages working on a single day, we would need 105 extra vehicles. Those extra vehicles driving around town would be doing so slowly, like the carriages so people can get a good look at everything. Or pulling over so frequently using up gallons and gallons of gas. 105 extra vehicles may not seem like a whole lot, but it is in such a small space. I, like Mark said, think you should really dig into the industry before judging it. Why don't you go to the companies and ask how things operate. How we are regulated and operated by the city. You'll see it's not just an integral part of Charleston's history or economy, but also its spirit. There are so many tours you can take, besides carriage tours. And if someone just wanted to take a "tour" they'd find a different way. People WANT to take a carriage tour. As a friend once pointed out. Whenever Charleston appears in a nationally published article on coming "first" in the nation for whatever reason, there is almost always a carriage photographed on our beautiful scenic streets. Carriages are not just a "thing" for Charleston, they are part of its Identity.
The New York Times today published a review of a new biography on Adolf Hitler and the twitterverse is snickering over its many thinly-veiled allusions to Donald Trump. Here’s an excerpt:
Hitler was an effective orator and actor, Mr. Ullrich reminds readers, adept at assuming various masks and feeding off the energy of his audiences. Although he concealed his anti-Semitism beneath a “mask of moderation” when trying to win the support of the socially liberal middle classes, he specialized in big, theatrical rallies staged with spectacular elements borrowed from the circus. Here, “Hitler adapted the content of his speeches to suit the tastes of his lower-middle-class, nationalist-conservative, ethnic-chauvinist and anti-Semitic listeners,” Mr. Ullrich writes. He peppered his speeches with coarse phrases and put-downs of hecklers. Even as he fomented chaos by playing to crowds’ fears and resentments, he offered himself as the visionary leader who could restore law and order.
Hitler increasingly presented himself in messianic terms, promising “to lead Germany to a new era of national greatness,” though he was typically vague about his actual plans. He often harked back to a golden age for the country, Mr. Ullrich says, the better “to paint the present day in hues that were all the darker. Everywhere you looked now, there was only decline and decay.”
Hitler’s repertoire of topics, Mr. Ullrich notes, was limited, and reading his speeches in retrospect, “it seems amazing that he attracted larger and larger audiences” with “repeated mantralike phrases” consisting largely of “accusations, vows of revenge and promises for the future.” But Hitler virtually wrote the modern playbook on demagoguery, arguing in “Mein Kampf” that propaganda must appeal to the emotions — not the reasoning powers — of the crowd. Its “purely intellectual level,” Hitler said, “will have to be that of the lowest mental common denominator among the public it is desired to reach.” Because the understanding of the masses “is feeble,” he went on, effective propaganda needed to be boiled down to a few slogans that should be “persistently repeated until the very last individual has come to grasp the idea that has been put forward.”
Powered by Foundation
© Copyright 2016,
Charleston City Paper