Narrow Search

Other Searches

Sorting by Posted Date

Comment Archives: Stories: News+Opinion

Re: “City Council considers requiring bar security to patrol sidewalks, parking lots”

*Trayvon Martin.

Anyway: Huh?

5 of 7 people like this.
Posted by Pronghorn on May 17, 2013 at 1:37 PM

Re: “City Council considers requiring bar security to patrol sidewalks, parking lots”

Can somebody say Travan Martin?

0 of 5 people like this.
Posted by Ima Oldman on May 17, 2013 at 12:52 PM

Re: “S.C. couple sues MUSC over unnecessary sex reassignment surgery”

reminds me of something a career nurse once told me: "you know the difference between a doctor and God? .... God knows he's not a doctor.

7 of 8 people like this.
Posted by Ima Oldman on May 17, 2013 at 12:50 PM

Re: “City Council considers requiring bar security to patrol sidewalks, parking lots”

Who gives them the right to make people leave that part of the sidewalk, anyway? Isn't that public property?

8 of 10 people like this.
Posted by Mathew Nelson on May 17, 2013 at 11:42 AM

Re: “Late Night law would force bar owners to create powerless police force, endanger lives”

Go suck a horses cock commie fucks!! Well split the difference later. So we take power from biz owners to decide weather you can smoke in a bar, making everyone go outside, then have them police us once we're their? Talk about ass backwards!

4 of 10 people like this.
Posted by Daniel Harbeson on May 17, 2013 at 11:12 AM

Re: “Late Night law would force bar owners to create powerless police force, endanger lives”

Funny, in Asheville, it was the business owners who wanted to create their own little police force...um, "ambassadors".

http://www.mountainx.com/business%20improv…

1 of 4 people like this.
Posted by mat catastrophe on May 17, 2013 at 10:26 AM

Re: “City Council considers requiring bar security to patrol sidewalks, parking lots”

Maybe they could use the (ooh, la la!) cabaret taxes to pay for a restroom trailer or 4-pack of porta-potties to park on Ann Street from, say 8pm-3am every Friday and Saturday, instead of adding nebulous duties for private security to patrol public streets. You could fit them in one parking spot, and cut down on the mentioned public urination problem. I of course don't remember EVER peeing in public back in my salad days of youth, no siree, Bob, but these young whippersnappers with their Red Bull and Jaeger-bombs have all that diuretic impact to deal with that us humble brew-swillers didn't.

5 of 6 people like this.
Posted by factoryconnection on May 17, 2013 at 10:25 AM

Re: “City Council considers requiring bar security to patrol sidewalks, parking lots”

Foodmancing, Thanks for stereotyping all door guys and bouncers. I work as a bouncer at a high frequency bar on King Street a few times a month for some extra income and because I do other business with the bar. I am highly college educated, have a normal size neck, and while I have been called many things in my life, 'goon' is not one of them.
Further, the other bouncers I work with are like me...have big boy jobs, families, and are upstanding members of the community. All of us have high education. In interest of being honest, one of our guys necks is a bit fat...however he would never be considered a 'goon.'
Oh, and $50 a night wouldn't get me off my couch.

9 of 11 people like this.
Posted by Joel Frank on May 17, 2013 at 10:03 AM

Re: “City Council considers requiring bar security to patrol sidewalks, parking lots”

Because there has never been a 'no-neck goon' cop. They all have masters degrees, eh foodmancing? derp. But I agree, it is a bad idea. If the city wants bouncers to police the streets, then they need to pay them to, not the bar owners.

9 of 12 people like this.
Posted by Jungle Jane on May 17, 2013 at 10:01 AM

Re: “Late Night law would force bar owners to create powerless police force, endanger lives”

Does anyone remember the Two Keys Tavern incident a few months ago? Telling Bar security they are responsible for policing the sidewalks and parking lots will end bad, period. With every bar in the city taking on security just think of the idiots that will suddenly be empowered for the first time in their more than likely pathetic life. Expect bloody beat downs and a spike in covered-up sexual assaults. Great Job gang

4 of 5 people like this.
Posted by Foodmancing on May 17, 2013 at 9:52 AM

Re: “City Council considers requiring bar security to patrol sidewalks, parking lots”

Because its a great idea to turn over enforcing order on the public sidewalks to a no-neck goon who dropped out of HS making $50 a night. Yea, no way that goes bad.

9 of 15 people like this.
Posted by Foodmancing on May 17, 2013 at 9:41 AM

Re: “School of the Arts tweet exposes Charleston County Schools' hypocrisy”

Tara hits the nail on the head as she always does.

Public schools are nothing more than communist indoctrination camps. Period.

8 of 15 people like this.
Posted by Tarafan on May 17, 2013 at 6:48 AM

Re: “School of the Arts tweet exposes Charleston County Schools' hypocrisy”

As the Scarlet Pimpernel used to say: "Standards Standards"

Posted by Cid95 on May 17, 2013 at 2:44 AM

Re: “Late Night law would force bar owners to create powerless police force, endanger lives”

"It shall be the responsibility of Late Night Entertainment Establishment personel (sic) to clear..."

That last word is very problematic. Are these bouncers going to be able to use batons and truncheonst? CS gas? Tasers? How about leashed snarling dogs?

Police are a legitimate use of tax funds. And these businesses definitely pay taxes.

5 of 6 people like this.
Posted by Cid95 on May 17, 2013 at 2:42 AM

Re: “Folly Beach County Park could reopen this summer”

idiots and hypocrites... CCL lied and said they would take this to court repeatedly if the county & state ever came up with the $$$ for the project. Why waste taxpayer $$$ for Mom Nature to wipe their a$$ again as before?

1 of 1 people like this.
Posted by Zoe St Piesse on May 17, 2013 at 1:29 AM

Re: “The problem with for-profit hospitals”

M Catastrophe should just change the title of his column to "Trolling the Libertarians"

0 of 4 people like this.
Posted by UnkleSteve on May 16, 2013 at 11:54 PM

Re: “Late Night law would force bar owners to create powerless police force, endanger lives”

IDK, all for increased safety here.

But this ordinance stinks of the City Powers That Be tendency to sterilize King of any flavor or character.

Much of Lower King could be a minimall anywhere.

Upper King has a vibrant and diverse mix that attracts crowds. Silly me,I always thought sidewalks were for hanging out. And what about the buskers and street musicians? There were some on Upper King tonight. They add great vibes to the street scene. Will that be illegal too?

FWIW, Savannah and Asheville have great and much more street music and atmosphere in and around bars.

Charleston finally starts loosening up but noooo have to put the Smackdown on that!

The City won't be happy until all of King is the soulless wasteland that much of South of Calhoun is. All so Edna and Al Fannypack of Ohio can feel "safe" waddling up King.

I guess the City will just ban bars next and install a KOA campground instead.

6 of 8 people like this.
Posted by Driftaway on May 16, 2013 at 10:49 PM

Re: “Is Anne Frank's Diary pornography?”

HUH?

1 of 2 people like this.
Posted by And if elected... on May 16, 2013 at 9:27 PM

Re: “Late Night law would force bar owners to create powerless police force, endanger lives”

Travis have u been to upper King, at 1:30 on a Saturday night lately? Not trying to pick an argument, but I would like to know.

2 of 2 people like this.
Posted by gnu name on May 16, 2013 at 8:16 PM

Re: “The problem with for-profit hospitals”

These companies you see advertising all sorts of medical products (catheters, diabetic supplies, ED products, scooters, etc.) on TV are making money hand over fist and every penny is coming from the 50% paying taxes!

Here's how it works ... They charge Medicare patients the $100 annual deductible, I think $0 for Medicaid, and say they require the client 20% co-pay, but most waive that under the guise of a "hardship" waiver. They then pocket the Medicare allowable. People paying the extra 20% are suckers and that's more profit to the supply company. If you call them and say you want to pay cash they refer you to another company. You call that company and get quoted a significantly lower cash price. This other company is owned by the same people, but they keep cash transactions separate from insurance so they don't get caught charging far less to the cash customers. The Medicare allowable is much more than the cash price, which also has a huge profit margin. There is no telling how much profit they are making on insurance based transactions. It's absolutely obscene I'm sure!!

The scooters you see on TV cost $40 to $60k each. A basic wheelchair can easily cost $2 to $5k. Yet you can but a luxury car for under $40k and a bicycle for $100.

Why are scooters & wheelchairs so expensive? Medicare, Medcaid, & other forms of insurance. Get the gubment out of medical & insurance transactions and the cost of these items would be pennies on the dollar compared to current costs.

Wanna know why the SEC never catches big Wall Street banks breaking the law? They don't want to. Go work for the SEC for 5 years then parlay that into a cushy high 6 figure salary at Goldman Sachs.

The bigger, more far reaching, and intrusive gubment is, the more opportunity there is for corruption and easier it is to get away with it.

When the banking crisis happened guess who was a high ranking executive at FannieMae? Barney Franks boyfriend!! And Frank was chairman of the powerful Banking Committee, which has oversight of the GSE's like Fannie & Freddie. And Frank constantly cried foul for years as the Bush administration warned of a coming banking & housing collapse. Then the Dems blamed Bush!!

3 of 6 people like this.
Posted by Ned Hill on May 16, 2013 at 7:13 PM
Classified Listings
{ more } Recent Comments
{ more } Reader Reviews
Most Viewed

Powered by Foundation   © Copyright 2013, Charleston City Paper   RSS