Narrow Search

Comment Archives: Stories: Last 30 Days

Re: “The Agenda: Johns Island TIF nixed, Capt. Sam's Spit to be reheard, SC-1 home stretch

Vic Rawl votes to complete I526, as Joe commanded, then City Planners scuttle Vic's plan to build on his John's Island property, then Joe tosses the planning commissions unanimous nay vote so Vic can build and make his fortune.
A sterling example of 'you scratch mine I'll scratch yours' - - political pay-off. Boss Hog politics is/are alive and well here in Charleston. What! No Sled investigation - - - yet ?

1 of 1 people like this.
Posted by 10sne1 on May 20, 2013 at 12:09 PM

Re: “Gearing up for a sober summer on Folly Beach

Was at Folly Beach a week ago enjoying the food and beverages at FBSC (which is under new management and could use another name) and I can tell you that for all the drinking that is not being done on the beach, patrons of area restaurants are taking up the slack. Everywhere you looked people were crowding into local establishments and even the Crosby's Seafood Friday night "dinner on the dock" had over 100 dinners enjoyed the open air ambiance of eating seafood beside the very fishing boats that caught it while watching a beautiful sunset over the marsh. (Have to wonder if their business license really allows that, but what the heck, sure looks like fun to me.) I am sure the beach ban will hurt a few businesses but overall it would appear to be a good thing. Now if they can just ban noisy motorcycles..

1 of 5 people like this.
Posted by And if elected... on May 20, 2013 at 12:08 PM

Re: “Tough Titties: Lowry Beall stares down breast cancer

Lowry!

I've thought of you often, and miss your fun quirkiness. Best of luck in all your future endeavors!!! <3

Posted by Amy Shelburn on May 20, 2013 at 12:08 PM

Re: “Charleston County considering a switch to paper ballots

There is no reason that the electronic voting machines could not be programmed to create a printed copy of the ballot submitted, which then could be verified by the voter and dropped into a sealed box. If there were any questions about the electronic results, the printed ballots, all of which should be readable since they were printed by the machine, could be counted by hand. I think all election jurisdictions need to make this a requirement for the vendors of the electronic machines.

7 of 8 people like this.
Posted by Steve Mencik on May 20, 2013 at 11:51 AM

Re: “Charleston County considering a switch to paper ballots

I've seen scanned paper ballots used in Florida, where they gave up on the touch screen machines after some very questionable election. People marked them in simple, card board table top booths, so time wasn't a huge issue. Then they were scanned. Valid votes got tabulated and dropped into a safe at the bottom of the scanner. Ones with problems like casting two votes for one office were kicked back and the voter got to try again with a new paper ballot. Whatever happened, all the hand marked ballots were locked up and safe for recount. Our touch screen machines aren't secure and can't be verified. There is absolutely no way to know what voters were ever cast on these machines in any reliable way. That realization is creeping through the SC political system despite the hostility of elected officials and both political parties. Republicans win on these machines, so they're OK with them. Democrats are afraid if people understand what is really going on that they'll stop bothering to vote. Increasing numbers of people don't bother to vote. South Carolina keeps them because we're cheap and because doubt in the mind of voters reduces turnout in disfavored groups.

4 of 6 people like this.
Posted by wjhamilton29464 on May 20, 2013 at 11:25 AM

Re: “Charleston County considering a switch to paper ballots

There are no good voting methods. Let's not do it anymore.

1 of 4 people like this.
Posted by mat catastrophe on May 20, 2013 at 10:46 AM

Re: “Burbage’s sale in the works

What else is he going to be smoking...? Sorry, too easy...

0 of 1 people like this.
Posted by nofaith on May 20, 2013 at 9:30 AM

Re: “City Council considers requiring bar security to patrol sidewalks, parking lots

Joel... you wrote, "I am highly college educated." I think you have just made Foodmancing's point for them. Well said sir!

3 of 5 people like this.
Posted by Chucktown-native on May 20, 2013 at 9:29 AM

Re: “Mr. Sanford goes (back) to Washington

Colbert Busch was supported by the unions that wanted to kill Boeing in the Charleston area. That alone should be enough to see that she didn't have the best interests of Charleston in mind. The district is largely conservative, especially in the fiscal sense and, all of his other faults not withstanding, that is the way that Sanford has always voted. ECB was evasive and vague about her positions so voters had to extrapolate her beliefs based on her supporters and donors such as the union support mentioned above. She had a very orchestrated campaign that largely only went to 'safe' situations. Like/agree with him or not, Sanford campaigned everywhere he could. Also, a bunch of her supporters were obviously not very informed as they thought they should be able to vote for her even though they did not live in her district. As for gerrymandering, it happens in every state, red or blue, and is done to benefit the party that was in power at the time redistricting happens. That is how I have the joy of being stuck in Jim Clyburn's district, arguably one of the worst Congressmen ever.

2 of 4 people like this.
Posted by nofaith on May 20, 2013 at 9:25 AM

Re: “Charleston County considering a switch to paper ballots

If you saw what happens to paper ballots (now absentee and provisional), you wouldn't want them. First, the Board of Elections throws out batches of them for minor flaws (I remember a case in which an elderly couple voted, and the wife witnessed both ballots. Hers was thrown out.) Then they are run through an old optical scanner which tears up at least one in 10 of them. Each damaged ballot is given to two election workers who painstakingly transfer the votes on it to a clean ballot, which is run through the machine (and perhaps torn up again).

2 of 3 people like this.
Posted by follitics on May 20, 2013 at 8:48 AM

Re: “Mr. Sanford goes (back) to Washington

This district -- and all of the state -- was very carefully gerrymandered in 2011. This time, the GOP not only took out most Black folks, but also most Democrats -- for instance, Clyburn's district now includes the west side of the peninsula all the way down to Broad, because it's College of Charleston territory. There's not much that can be done about that. And your post says it -- "a rare vote to a Democrat." Colbert Busch was a strong conservative Democrat and a businesswoman. What is your definition of "stronger candidate"?

1 of 2 people like this.
Posted by follitics on May 20, 2013 at 8:42 AM

Re: “Clean energy activists to join Saturday for "Hands Across the Sand"

"will stand along their coastlines in solidarity".......rotflmbo!

0 of 4 people like this.
Posted by rwsmith on May 19, 2013 at 11:28 PM

Re: “Columbia’s art community gives Charleston a run for its money

wow. I am like a year getting back to these responses. I see a lot of people promoting their own interests and groups in these postings. In order - really bad photo to use.
Dance omission - absolutely correct.
Palmetto Opera - not a major player.
I've been to all these things in G-ville and know the city and its arts community well. G-ville open studios has been a huge success in ways that the one in Columbia could only hope to be. I do not know what museum in G-ville shows artwork going back to 2000 BC. And you forgot the BJUniv. Art Museum and Pendleton St. arts area.

Posted by carolinaculture on May 19, 2013 at 9:46 PM

Re: “Late Night law would force bar owners to create powerless police force, endanger lives

The little tyrant is loving his last days. He finally has a toady for a police chief without the guts to tell him this is an idiotic idea. City Council is simply a rubber stamp for this sort of Bloombergism.

2 of 3 people like this.
Posted by Bob Manning on May 19, 2013 at 8:57 PM

Re: “Burbage’s sale in the works

One of the great things about this transition is that Al is going continue to smoke the pork... and more.

4 of 4 people like this.
Posted by davrutick on May 19, 2013 at 7:43 PM

Re: “Burbage’s sale in the works

This is great news. David understands what the Burbage's have done for this neighborhood and he wants to ensure that neighborhood feel continues. I hope he can smoke pork half as well as Al!

4 of 4 people like this.
Posted by P.C. on May 19, 2013 at 5:19 PM

Re: “Gearing up for a sober summer on Folly Beach

I don't see how you can call this propaganda, Chris. It's really nothing more than an update on where the ban-opposition movement stands, with some colorful language to make it an interesting read. My inclusion of LaJuan was reason enough to stick to a straight-forward approach that doesn't waver to either side. I respect her and her stance throughout this process. I think you've read it with strong bias. And of course, you're right - if they don't get the signatures they need, it's a dead issue. If they do, the story explains the process of what will happen. Simple as that. Finally, you'd be surprised how many people who do not live on Folly aren't exactly sure what the status of the ban is. I have to tell people all the time, especially now that it's beach weather, that 'yes, drinking is illegal now.' So the piece was also a reader service to reinforce that the ban is indeed in place.

3 of 4 people like this.
Posted by Marco Escandolos on May 19, 2013 at 5:00 PM

Re: “Gearing up for a sober summer on Folly Beach

No doubt, the beer pour into Coke cans
is rampant, not that I have ever done that. No way.
No sir.

1 of 2 people like this.
Posted by Driftaway on May 19, 2013 at 12:58 PM

Re: “City Council considers requiring bar security to patrol sidewalks, parking lots

In this article, Boston, from the Rec Room, rightly states that bars pay higher taxes because its already recognized that we're more of a burden on city services. I think we pay like 1000% more for our business license than a similarly sized law office. What no one has mentioned yet is: 1). Liability insurance rates skyrocket when bars employ bouncers, I mean security personnel, because ins. co.s know that it leads to more lawsuits. 2). We are still gonna call the cops, only now we'll have more incidents, so we'll call even more. 3). Affected communities can already persue remedy against offending businesses: noise, nuisance, drug, and pandering laws are already on the books, and responsible business owners stay on good terms with their neighbors and avoid getting sued/arrested. Irresponsible business owners can be forced out. 4). There will be no geographical boundaries to this law. While it's aimed at upper King, it will apply equally to freestanding buildings in industrial zones and suburban shopping malls.
The city already has an arsenal of tools to affect change. Like the gun lobby says: "Let's start enforcing existing laws before we rush to write new ones".
Mike Kulick
Voodoo Tiki Bar & Lounge
The Tattooed Moose

9 of 11 people like this.
Posted by vudumike on May 19, 2013 at 10:42 AM

Re: “Late Night law would force bar owners to create powerless police force, endanger lives

In the related article, Boston, from the Rec Room, rightly states that bars pay higher taxes because its already recognized that we're more of a burden on city services. I think we pay like 1000% more for our business license than a similarly sized law office. What no one has mentioned yet is: 1). Liability insurance rates skyrocket when bars employ bouncers, I mean security personnel, because ins. co.s know that it leads to more lawsuits. 2). We are still gonna call the cops, only now we'll have more incidents, so we'll call even more. 3). Affected communities can already persue remedy against offending businesses: noise, nuisance, drug, and pandering laws are already on the books, and responsible business owners stay on good terms with their neighbors and avoid getting sued/arrested. Irresponsible business owners can be forced out. 4). There will be no geographical boundaries to this law. While it's aimed at upper King, it will apply equally to freestanding buildings in industrial zones and suburban shopping malls.
The city already has an arsenal of tools to affect change. Like the gun lobby says: "Let's start enforcing existing laws before we rush to write new ones".
Mike Kulick
Voodoo Tiki Bar & Lounge
The Tattooed Moose

5 of 7 people like this.
Posted by vudumike on May 19, 2013 at 10:39 AM
Classified Listings

Powered by Foundation   © Copyright 2013, Charleston City Paper   RSS