Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

    • All
    • Today
    • Last 7 Days
    • Last 30 Days
    • Select a Date Range

Other Searches

Sorting by Posted Date

Comment Archives: Stories: News+Opinion: Haire of the Dog

Re: “R.I.P. Harry Reems: A tribute to the best porn star names”

HUH?

Posted by And if elected... on March 22, 2013 at 7:25 PM

Re: “R.I.P. Harry Reems: A tribute to the best porn star names”

mat catastrophe is also my porn name. For reals.

0 of 1 people like this.
Posted by mat catastrophe on March 22, 2013 at 12:23 AM

Re: “For the first time in my life, I'm ashamed of Rush Limbaugh”

Best description of Congress, EVER.

1 of 2 people like this.
Posted by aaajn on March 14, 2013 at 5:07 PM

Re: “Anonymous releases nude photos of innocent victim in Steubenville rape case”

Serendipity: 'Kyle, let me help you out here....(and I understand it's a free speech, free world so save the lecture)... it's "inappropriate" to keep explicit photos of girls on your PC. If someone else sends it, delete it and tell the sender it's not cool. If a girl sends one of herself, delete it, and tell her it's not cool. In doing so, YOU'RE the cool one get it?'

Excuse me? How on Earth is it inappropriate to keep explicit photos of girls on your PC? Are you seriously going to tell people that porn shouldn't exist, or are you telling me that it should only exist on the Internet and not on people's PC's? Why shouldn't girls be free to take pictures of themselves in whatever state of dress they like and send them to guys who appreciate that sort of thing? Why would I want to delete a photo I like? Why would I want to tell the sender that it's not cool? Why would that make me the cool one? Should we all just organize our own personal PC's according to what we wouldn't want revealed if someone were to hack into our systems?

You're moving the goalpost, because even if it were "inappropriate" to keep explicit photos of girls on your PC, Anonymous was still wrong in their assessment that Jim Parks had nude photos of minors. Nobody seems to care that people are lying to smear the name of an apparently innocent man, and no one seems willing to do the slightest bit of investigation to determine if these people are telling the truth or not.

Posted by Kyle Delaney on March 12, 2013 at 6:19 PM

Re: “Anonymous releases nude photos of innocent victim in Steubenville rape case”

It's ALL horrible. I understand what anonymous is trying to do here, not the best way obviously but exposure to the truth - I get it. General Rule - If you don't want something to be exposed; don't do it, keep it, hide it etc. to begin with. And to the idiot who recorded the comments and the idiot who made the comments....well, good luck getting into a good college or finding a job when you graduate (My firm won't be hiring you). Kyle, let me help you out here....(and I understand it's a free speech, free world so save the lecture)... it's "inappropriate" to keep explicit photos of girls on your PC. If someone else sends it, delete it and tell the sender it's not cool. If a girl sends one of herself, delete it, and tell her it's not cool. In doing so, YOU'RE the cool one get it?

Posted by SerendipityCS@yahoo.com on March 12, 2013 at 5:43 PM

Re: “Secession would turn South Carolina into a zombie apocalypse”

Raver,

Just interested where you obtained the demographic information on those who signed the petition. It is noted however that ever individual that signed the Constitution of the United States and the Declaration of Independence (The original seccession document, that inconsequently created our country) was indeed as white. It would seem that maybe seccession is not about racism, but maybe about individual freedom to chose ones own form of government.

Posted by Adam Sean Finley on March 8, 2013 at 8:11 AM

Re: “Anonymous releases nude photos of innocent victim in Steubenville rape case”

Yeah, the author screwed up when he equated the sharing of these photos to rape. But apart from that, the article is correct. There don't seem to be any nude photos of a minor or nude photos of anyone who wasn't taking them and sending them by their own free will. It looks like there's nothing incriminating at all here. Jim Parks did nothing wrong by having these photos, and Anonymous did something wrong by violating his privacy. And the woman in the photos certainly doesn't deserve to have her privacy violated like this. And if the pictures were taken against her will then it would be even worse to share them, but luckily that almost certainly isn't the case. I myself have been fortunate enough to receive pictures of this nature from girls, as I'm sure many guys have. The pictures are not disturbing, and I don't deserve to have my computer cracked open so everyone else can see my pictures. And I'd be horrified for the sake of the girls in the pictures who trusted me to keep my promise not to let anyone else see.

Posted by Kyle Delaney on March 6, 2013 at 4:20 PM

Re: “The Passion of Mark Sanford: A work of slash fiction”

".....cute" Hey H.S.T. try drugs and booze before you try to be over the top.

Posted by Wags on February 28, 2013 at 10:14 PM

Re: “The Passion of Mark Sanford: A work of slash fiction”

What the hell was the point of this?

Posted by Foodmancing on February 28, 2013 at 3:14 PM

Re: “The Passion of Mark Sanford: A work of slash fiction”

not a single Haire of any dog, Sanford stories make me sick ... The C Street Congressional Cult is all about an alleged deity granting total forgiveness for any crime perpetrators by such "leaders".... this is the same Sanford that Elizabeth Colbert-Busch & her ORIENT CONTAINER CORPORATION gave 1500 buck$ to.... for what ? A port Congressional perk ? Her near future job @ Clemson knowing he'd be Governor in 358 days....? Ditch digging? Is this supposed to be some secret metaphor on Morrison Drive ?

1 of 1 people like this.
Posted by Larry Carter Center on February 28, 2013 at 1:45 PM

Re: “The Passion of Mark Sanford: A work of slash fiction”

lol chris and mat represent communist/progressive ideology.

0 of 2 people like this.
Posted by Ned Hill on February 28, 2013 at 12:12 PM

Re: “For the first time in my life, I'm ashamed of Rush Limbaugh”

Do you know how icebergs work?

0 of 2 people like this.
Posted by mat catastrophe on February 24, 2013 at 1:46 AM

Re: “For the first time in my life, I'm ashamed of Rush Limbaugh”

It might. If legislating was something you took a turn at instead of spending decades doing, maybe we'd have a Congress that wasn't so in bed with lobbyists. Maybe legislators wouldn't be so entrenched in parties and vying for leadership positions within them. And maybe they wouldn't be afraid to make the decisions that are necessary for fear of losing campaign contributions and the next election. There'd be a little less lust for power if it didn't have such permanence.

4 of 4 people like this.
Posted by Paulius on February 24, 2013 at 12:09 AM

Re: “For the first time in my life, I'm ashamed of Rush Limbaugh”

"Until we start rotating those clowns we have elected..."

I love how people think that will actually fix anything.

3 of 5 people like this.
Posted by mat catastrophe on February 23, 2013 at 10:58 PM

Re: “For the first time in my life, I'm ashamed of Rush Limbaugh”

This dog and pony show in DC has been going on longer than Rush has been commenting. Anything in Washington that happens is for the good of the elected officials. If it happens to trickle down to the general populace, then we are lucky. Until we start rotating those clowns we have elected, we will continue to have this sort of horse squeeze in DC, as these idiots need this drama to survive and prosper.

9 of 9 people like this.
Posted by localhutch on February 23, 2013 at 12:42 PM

Re: “For the first time in my life, I'm ashamed of Rush Limbaugh”

From Wikipedia:
"Limbaugh has been an outspoken critic of what he sees as leniency towards criminal drug use in America. On his television show in October 5, 1995, Limbaugh stated, "too many whites are getting away with drug use" and illegal drug trafficking. Limbaugh proposed that the racial disparity in drug enforcement could be fixed if authorities increased detection efforts, conviction rates, and jail time for whites involved in illegal drugs."
So in other word, all drug addicts should be locked up forever. (Except him).

7 of 11 people like this.
Posted by FCB on February 23, 2013 at 12:22 PM

Re: “For the first time in my life, I'm ashamed of Rush Limbaugh”

Rush Limbaugh has made me ashamed to be an American for years.

14 of 18 people like this.
Posted by Hank Putnam on February 23, 2013 at 11:16 AM

Re: “For the first time in my life, I'm ashamed of Rush Limbaugh”

Having the freedom to be ashamed of your country publicly is one of the things that makes this shit hole of a nation so great.

12 of 16 people like this.
Posted by Ron Liberte on February 22, 2013 at 1:34 PM

Re: “For the first time in my life, I'm ashamed of Rush Limbaugh”

I wonder if Michelle Obama will go back to her non-proud state of America when the next republican is elected president. I guess Chris' hypocrisy and snark only go one way.

It's pretty sad that Chris blogs for a free paper but isn't fit to include in the print edition.

8 of 18 people like this.
Posted by Wekq4 on February 22, 2013 at 12:13 PM

Re: “The Passion of Mark Sanford: A work of slash fiction”

Are all writers for the City Paper so self indulgent?

2 of 2 people like this.
Posted by dp4 on February 22, 2013 at 8:54 AM
Classified Listings
{ more } Recent Comments
{ more } Reader Reviews
Most Viewed

Powered by Foundation   © Copyright 2013, Charleston City Paper   RSS