mat catastrophe is also my porn name. For reals.
Best description of Congress, EVER.
Serendipity: 'Kyle, let me help you out here....(and I understand it's a free speech, free world so save the lecture)... it's "inappropriate" to keep explicit photos of girls on your PC. If someone else sends it, delete it and tell the sender it's not cool. If a girl sends one of herself, delete it, and tell her it's not cool. In doing so, YOU'RE the cool one get it?'
Excuse me? How on Earth is it inappropriate to keep explicit photos of girls on your PC? Are you seriously going to tell people that porn shouldn't exist, or are you telling me that it should only exist on the Internet and not on people's PC's? Why shouldn't girls be free to take pictures of themselves in whatever state of dress they like and send them to guys who appreciate that sort of thing? Why would I want to delete a photo I like? Why would I want to tell the sender that it's not cool? Why would that make me the cool one? Should we all just organize our own personal PC's according to what we wouldn't want revealed if someone were to hack into our systems?
You're moving the goalpost, because even if it were "inappropriate" to keep explicit photos of girls on your PC, Anonymous was still wrong in their assessment that Jim Parks had nude photos of minors. Nobody seems to care that people are lying to smear the name of an apparently innocent man, and no one seems willing to do the slightest bit of investigation to determine if these people are telling the truth or not.
It's ALL horrible. I understand what anonymous is trying to do here, not the best way obviously but exposure to the truth - I get it. General Rule - If you don't want something to be exposed; don't do it, keep it, hide it etc. to begin with. And to the idiot who recorded the comments and the idiot who made the comments....well, good luck getting into a good college or finding a job when you graduate (My firm won't be hiring you). Kyle, let me help you out here....(and I understand it's a free speech, free world so save the lecture)... it's "inappropriate" to keep explicit photos of girls on your PC. If someone else sends it, delete it and tell the sender it's not cool. If a girl sends one of herself, delete it, and tell her it's not cool. In doing so, YOU'RE the cool one get it?
Just interested where you obtained the demographic information on those who signed the petition. It is noted however that ever individual that signed the Constitution of the United States and the Declaration of Independence (The original seccession document, that inconsequently created our country) was indeed as white. It would seem that maybe seccession is not about racism, but maybe about individual freedom to chose ones own form of government.
Yeah, the author screwed up when he equated the sharing of these photos to rape. But apart from that, the article is correct. There don't seem to be any nude photos of a minor or nude photos of anyone who wasn't taking them and sending them by their own free will. It looks like there's nothing incriminating at all here. Jim Parks did nothing wrong by having these photos, and Anonymous did something wrong by violating his privacy. And the woman in the photos certainly doesn't deserve to have her privacy violated like this. And if the pictures were taken against her will then it would be even worse to share them, but luckily that almost certainly isn't the case. I myself have been fortunate enough to receive pictures of this nature from girls, as I'm sure many guys have. The pictures are not disturbing, and I don't deserve to have my computer cracked open so everyone else can see my pictures. And I'd be horrified for the sake of the girls in the pictures who trusted me to keep my promise not to let anyone else see.
".....cute" Hey H.S.T. try drugs and booze before you try to be over the top.
What the hell was the point of this?
not a single Haire of any dog, Sanford stories make me sick ... The C Street Congressional Cult is all about an alleged deity granting total forgiveness for any crime perpetrators by such "leaders".... this is the same Sanford that Elizabeth Colbert-Busch & her ORIENT CONTAINER CORPORATION gave 1500 buck$ to.... for what ? A port Congressional perk ? Her near future job @ Clemson knowing he'd be Governor in 358 days....? Ditch digging? Is this supposed to be some secret metaphor on Morrison Drive ?
lol chris and mat represent communist/progressive ideology.
Do you know how icebergs work?
It might. If legislating was something you took a turn at instead of spending decades doing, maybe we'd have a Congress that wasn't so in bed with lobbyists. Maybe legislators wouldn't be so entrenched in parties and vying for leadership positions within them. And maybe they wouldn't be afraid to make the decisions that are necessary for fear of losing campaign contributions and the next election. There'd be a little less lust for power if it didn't have such permanence.
"Until we start rotating those clowns we have elected..."
I love how people think that will actually fix anything.
This dog and pony show in DC has been going on longer than Rush has been commenting. Anything in Washington that happens is for the good of the elected officials. If it happens to trickle down to the general populace, then we are lucky. Until we start rotating those clowns we have elected, we will continue to have this sort of horse squeeze in DC, as these idiots need this drama to survive and prosper.
"Limbaugh has been an outspoken critic of what he sees as leniency towards criminal drug use in America. On his television show in October 5, 1995, Limbaugh stated, "too many whites are getting away with drug use" and illegal drug trafficking. Limbaugh proposed that the racial disparity in drug enforcement could be fixed if authorities increased detection efforts, conviction rates, and jail time for whites involved in illegal drugs."
So in other word, all drug addicts should be locked up forever. (Except him).
Rush Limbaugh has made me ashamed to be an American for years.
Having the freedom to be ashamed of your country publicly is one of the things that makes this shit hole of a nation so great.
I wonder if Michelle Obama will go back to her non-proud state of America when the next republican is elected president. I guess Chris' hypocrisy and snark only go one way.
It's pretty sad that Chris blogs for a free paper but isn't fit to include in the print edition.
Are all writers for the City Paper so self indulgent?
Powered by Foundation
© Copyright 2013,
Charleston City Paper