Jack, do you know what had to happen in order for the Bill of Rights and Constitution to be established? Armed insurrection.
Gun nuts love to claim that they have the freedom to have weapons in order to protect against an oppressive government, but as you mentioned, the government just keeps on oppressin. So you guys clearly are not being effective.
I think it's time you and your Tea Party pals who went to rallies talking about watering the tree of liberty and whatnot finally put your money where your mouth is. You all sure like to talk a big game, so let's get this overthrow in motion!
Fish Pimp: if you are claiming the "right" to ejaculate into vaginae WITHOUT paying child support in some sort of "contract" with a woman, there IS NO SUCH RIGHT.... EVEN IF a woman steals your sperm out of a condom and impregnates herself later when you are out of the room, "the child" is still due your paternity and child support.... ZERO EXCEPTIONS..... If you have sex with a woman you are in fact agreeing to be a father...... intercourse can NOT be separated legally from pregnancy.... ONLY IF A SPERM DONOR GIVES his semen to a licensed gynecologist for ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION is there legal protection from paternity..... I am such a surrogate father and I signed a contract with a doctor protecting my privacy from the birth mother and any spouse she may be married to.... I did agree to be contacted if my progeny needed bone marrow or organ donation.....I can only presume s/he all such children are healthy and NOT LOOKING FOR ME in "registries" that serve both adopted children and adult children of artificial inseminations.
There is nothing "conservative" about enslaving women to forced pregnancy. Pessary, abortifacient & Caesarian "section" has been around since the pyramids of Egypt. Women decide if they want to stay pregnant. Thursday some criminal theocrat FEMALE Rethuglican introduced a bill into the New Mexico legislature to PRESERVE EVIDENCE OF RAPE banning abortions for raped pregnant women. I'll type it again: "ABORTION IS DESTRUCTION OF RAPE EVIDENCE" a felony as proposed by law in NM. This lawmaker for an alleged god is not really trying to preserve evidence or DNA in the tissues of a embryo or fetus. A rape kit or capture of a pubic hair from the crime scene is good enough, but noooooo, this traitor to woman hood from the party of Romney has merely invented a new way to force all women to stay pregnant. No exceptions. Jack Hunter is incapable of discussing this issue rationally. He's a Rethuglican for females to be enslaved and rib poking vegans in the process. 843-926-1750 @LarryAccomplish
What I find MOST disgusting (aside from the attack on our RIGHTS), is the fact that government employees are exempt from any such en-actions. Not just government employees, but ex,as well as retired employees. I do NOT understand why it is that those whom we have elected seem to believe and act accordingly, that they are somehow exempt from the laws they enact! Healthcare, Retirement, Gun laws, etc...
I look for the day when it becomes understood that becoming an employee of the people does NOT exempt one from law, but places them under greater constraints.
As a Democrat, I'm thrilled by your column. CD 1 is a tough district for us, but it will be infinitely easier if Sanford bears the Republican standard. Think of how much fun the TV comedians will have with it. Do you really think South Carolinians like being the butt of jokes all over the country? Bring it on!
Don't forget the THEOCRATIC CRIME FAMILY CONGRESSIONAL CULT Sanford belongs to @ 138 C Street in WDC..... Chuck Grassley & so many other gangsters since 1935 have hid behind their "prayer circles" to install murderous dictators in Uganda amongst many other nations planning to murder homosexuals and jail family members who do not turn in their gay relatives for execution.... It is time American Atheists are celebrated as heroic patriots and end the McCarthyism that dictates to us all yet today.... 843-926-1750 @LarryAccomplish Larry_Carter_Center@yahoo.com
73 criminal violations of AIRPLANEtravel laws 73 thousand dollars in fines paid by corporations donating to this criminal theocrat Marcus Sanford.... 110 counts of campaign fraud by Bobby Harrell refusing to live by 44.5 cents per mile in driving like all other lawmakers to Columbia.... AIRPLANEgate something about gangsters in office like Sanford & Harrell, must be the "need for speed" of boy Bush the deserter from the Texas Air National Guard avoiding his second and all other flight physicals on his birthday as required by law.... AIRPLANES & RETHUGLICANS AND COCAINE .... Ravenel, such names along with RACIST RAPIST Thurmond keep haunting us all beyond the graves of half a million Americans caused by the TREASON OF SECESSION April 20 now 153 years ago.... becoming a country so male "owners" can rape black women to sell their babies..... Lindsey Graham with is FT Sumter giant photo in his office.... Glenn McConnell and his pair of token black "servants" ... at least Maurice Bessinger is dead, no longer able to spew racist venom at African American people who hungry and unaware, stumble into his family of bar be que crime joints.... I am running for Congress to bring sanity to this farce of South Carolina where Nimrata Haley takes bribes to betray our main port of Charleston to satisfy her criminal corporation donors from Savannah Georgia..... AIRPLANEgate toxic waste DREDGINGgate.... and how about Bobby Harrell using Speaker's Official documents to pressure the State Pharmacy Board to let him create a drug repackaging monopoly ? The criminals running loose at our abortion clinic..... The madness will only end when we elect an honest true conservative to grow our economy with GREEN NEW DEAL JOBS ending massive mega million dollar corruption by these Rethuglicans 843-926-1750 @LarryAccomplish Larry_Carter_Center@yahoo.com
"Conservative's Conservative"?? Sanford who was censured by the South Carolina General Assembly following a State Ethics Commission investigation into allegations that he had misused state travel funds to conduct his affair?
I'm starting to see why the Ron Paul campaign starting distancing itself from you during the elections. Jesse Benton was a clown but maybe he had you figured out?
Ron Paul was definitely the greatest politician I have ever witnessed.
If ten percent of politicians were similar to him, I would still have great hopes for our Constitutional Republic.
It has been his passion for liberty and limited government that helped guide me to where I stand politically firm today, Voluntarism.
Beautifully written, Jack.
It is the works of men, like yourself and both Dr.s Paul that renew and affirm my faith...
that should America fail, it was not because brave men did not give their hearts to the cause.
FP, that's ridiculous and you know it. You think anyone here believes that was justified? You know what's just as stupid as what you just wrote? If I were to say this: Huey Newton killed Oakland Police Officer John Frey and even boasted of the murder and that he never regretted it. But Newton, being a Black Panther, was for civil rights for black people, so you must think his crime was justified. Why do you want to kill police officers, Fish Pimp?!?! See how silly the guilt of the whole inferred by the guilt of one argument is? That's what you just did.
I pointed out last week that TIMOTHY MCVEIGH committed a terrorist act that killed hundreds of people in a misguided defense of his second amendment rights in 1994. Apparently Hunter and the local drones feel this was justified because you can NEVER be too extreme in your defense of freedom.
There is no moral equivalency here. The facts support Ron's analogy.
This article is so full of generalities that it amounts to platitudes. Mr. Hunter's Dr. Evil characterizations of George Bush and Barack Obama do not hold up to a moment's scrutiny, nor does the false equivalency he tries to draw. He doesn't offer a scrap of evidence to support his assertions, but I will.
The Patriot Act has been found to be constitutional over and over again. The controversial part, Section 213, does not expand delayed-notice warrants or 'sneak and peak" searches, which have been used by law enforcement for decades. It merely establishes a uniform national standard for their use. The Supreme Court ruled back in 1979, in U.S. v. Dahlia, that covert entry pursuant to a judicial warrant does not violate the 4th Amendment. In 2000, before 9/11, the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals held, in U.S. v Simon, that delayed notification was constitutional. Libertarians may not like this, but it's not unlawful and it sure as hell doesn't amount to Bush using 9/11 as "an excuse to shred the Fourth Amendment and start an irrational war in Iraq that neoconservatives had been itching for since the Clinton administration."
Go look up the President's 23 Executive Orders and tell me, as Mr. Hunter does, that "Obama is using Sandy Hook as an excuse to trample the Second Amendment." I think the measures are useless and amount to nothing more than making him and his base feel like they "did something," but they're also harmless.
#7 Launch a national safe and responsible gun ownership campaign.
#11 Nominate an ATF director.
#14 Issue a Presidential Memorandum directing the Centers for Disease Control to research the causes and prevention of gun violence.
#20 Release a letter to state health officials clarifying the scope of mental health services that Medicaid plans must cover.
Dangerous? Threat to our Liberties? How about MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING! How about we quit wasting our time with the idiotic national gun debate and focus on what actually matters, something conservatives and libertarians agree on, and that really does threaten our future -- Debt & Spending.
"I spent a career carrying typically either an M16, and later an M4 carbine. And an M4 carbine fires a .223 caliber round, which is 5.56 millimeters, at about 3,000 feet per second. When it hits a human body, the effects are devastating. It's designed to do that. And that's what our soldiers ought to carry. I personally don't think there's any need for that kind of weaponry on the streets and particularly around the schools in America. I believe that we've got to take a serious look. I understand everybody's desire to have whatever they want, but we’ve got to protect our children, we’ve got to protect our police, we've got to protect our population. And I think we have to take a very mature look at that."
--Retired Gen. Stanley McChrystal
what is that you folks fear or is fear it self--i hope that everyone enjoy!s their family, friends,your sons, daughters,mothers,fathers,grandsons,grandaughters---life is what!s going on--everyone needs to keep on keeping on..live long and prosper...
I don't know of bigger hypocrite on a moral or professional level than Sanford.
I expect a lot of other voters will feel the same.
Remember when he said Bill Clinton should resign because "he broke his vows of marriage" That was classic Sanford.
Who needs an emotionaly unstable,, blubbering, flake representing them regardless of their professed political beliefs.
There are much better choices, with the possible exception of Limehouse.
Democrats are praying Sanford gets the nomination.
That would be their best chance of pulling off an upset win.
Well, that box was actually opened a very long time ago with John Adams' Alien and Sedition Acts. W is just the most egregious of late. Either way, the leaders of both sides are much too willing to expand an increasingly consolidated government power whenever they are in charge. The problem is, the government you control today may not be yours to control tomorrow, and it will be no less powerful. And, yes, I very much wish the lid was back on the box.
Ron Liberte says, "Right now in the Kabul City Paper, some Islamic militant is writing an op-ed justifying his extremism too. I guess it makes sense, Islamic militants have a lot in common with the American Right - their views on women and other minorities and their ambitions for total theocracy, for example. You guys should get together and exchange notes."
Logical fallacies galore, here, Ron. Skewed comparison, for sure. Guilt of the whole inferred from guilt of the few. Vague assertions to be accepted as true. And on it goes. The "American Right" does not march in lockstep, no more than the "American Left." I'm an old fogey, and in all my life's experiences I have seldom come across a politically conservative individual who does not respect women and womanhood. In fact, most of these "right-wingers" tend to be the ones who place women on the proverbial pedestal, and are still among the few who open doors for women and stand up to let them sit down on the bus. I live in a mostly conservative area, and am a non-affiliated voter, mostly right-leaning but always an independent thinker.
Almost to a person, my conservative friends have been among the avant garde when it comes to respecting people of all races. This back in the '50's and '60's and continuing today. In sharp contrast to the southern democrats I ran across during my military service. Total theocracy? You've got to be kidding, right? Just a belief that society is in dire need of some moral compass. This coupled with the realization of the broad implications of Christianity in our daily lives and actions, whether we are a carpenter or a politician. Makes no difference. The response from many "modern" liberals: "Whose morals? Yours or mine?" Translation: "Who's needs morals? If it feels good, do it."
As far as extremism, I liken it to two groups gathered on the opposite ends of a long rope, playing tug-of-war. Chances are, because most of us are along the rope somewhere between them, the rope will be held relatively steady and neither extreme group will be able to take off and run with it in either direction. Unless we loosen our grip or lose our focus.
Considering I post here to mostly amuse myself, I am not super concerned if my ramblings carry enough intellectual value for your standards. You, Hunter and Ned, et. al are not stopping the government from expanding its reach by posting here, and I'm not convincing y'all that your approach to governing is moronic. So it's all in good fun!
I'm not sure from where your image of the Left comes. Most of the progressives I know understood that once W. opened Pandora's box, no president would be willing or able to close it again. I think we both want that box to be closed, for what it's worth.
"if you want me to address the argument..."
What I want is for your posts to have some intellectual value, whether I agree with them or not. Quite often they're full of straw man arguments or sweeping generalizations and stereotypes (the same way Ned argues about liberals). Take factoryconnection as an example. I probably disagree with him slightly more often than not, but what he writes is always well reasoned and adds value to the conversation without being insulting.
"if you're going to fight against monsters you have to take care not to become one yourself."
Absolutely right...and this applies to governments as well, which is what I took the point of this column to be. Also, I think unwillingness to to view things from another perspective is addressed. After 9/11, the neocons were unwilling to see the Left's concerns on a government trampling rights for safety. Now they're experiencing the shoe being put on the other foot. Meanwhile, the Left seems to have forgotten how they felt about Bush's actions after 9/11.
"using fear for political gain"
That's not a liberal or neo-conservative thing. That's a human thing. Some are just more prone to fear than others.
Powered by Foundation
© Copyright 2013,
Charleston City Paper