Do people actually listen to old Linds?
"Sen. Lindsay Graham made it clear what kind of campaign he would run. "I want to be president to defeat the enemies trying to kill us," he announced."
Curious that he would want to defeat the Republican Party. That can't be a sound campaign strategy.
She was not simply a product of her times, she was a supporter of the institution! She had choices just like the Blackburn sisters did, to support the institution of slavery or to be an abolitionist, or at the very least show respect for human life! She chose to support and promote slavery in an extreme and profound way. Causing untold damage for the relationship between the races and for the negative perception of a race of people undeserving of such!
I remember your parents; your dad better than your mom. The times I visited you in your home were surreal. I was the son of a mill worked visiting in the home of the plant manager. I had family members who told me that I didn't respect my place. My daddy loved it; but, he was unusual for a forth-grad educated mill hand.
Your mother was the definition of a refined Southern lady. She was hospitable to me and very kind, although I'm sure that she knew I didn't belong there.
I'm glad you didn't respect the social rules of mill-town Kershaw. I'd have missed a special chapter. I'd have missed a special friendship.
Here's to rebels who broke some rigid rules!
Couldn't have said it better myself!
I enjoy reading Shreadley. You, on the other hand, are passing on something more akin to "Talking Points". Benghazi taught me that Democrats in leadership can say anything as long as they stick together...loyal to the Talking Points. And you, most certainly, are no different. Thank you, Mr. Schreadley. Will Moredock is more suitable to AP or MSNBC.
“I believe all Southern liberals come from the same starting point--race. Once you figure out they are lying to you about race, you start to question everything.”
― Molly Ivins
The Establishment Clause only addresses what the Congress may or may not do
arty wants us to "quit making law in the Legislative branch": with Republicans in charge of Congress, he is likely to get his wish!
I don't know if Factory Connection was trying to be a wise guy or a dumb ass, but the site for the very secular Lowcountry Food Bank is http://lowcountryfoodbank.org/hope
Maybe we can get corporate marketing out of schools too? I always find it strange that we strictly prohibit religious proselytizers in our public schools but the Chic-fil-a Cow is always welcome to spread his message.
Given the US supreme court's ruling on prayers at city council meetings, it would not surprise me if our Opus Dei court overturns the ban on school prayer before Scalia shuffles off his mortal coil.
This court doesn't care about precedent. It doesn't appear to occur to them that a future court will have at least as much contempt for their newbie precedents than they have shown for those which are a century old.
Arty, Article III is a pretty significant part of the Constitution. Sorry, you don't get to set SCOTUS precedents aside.
Lewis and Mat, I'm embarrassed. Of course laws are made in the Legislative branch and I erroneously used Legislative instead of Judicial branch in my statement above. I, too, used to think "intent" was important in interpreting the often ambiguous wording of the Constitution. However, given the often lack of impartiality in SCOTUS rulings, I think we suffer enough with the wording and the consideration of intent (which, btw, is outside of the Constitution) further distorts the law of the land.
McCollum v. Bd. of Educ., 333 U.S. 203, 231 (1948). In “no activity of the State is it more vital to keep out divisive forces than in its schools, to avoid confusing, not to say fusing, what the Constitution sought to keep strictly apart.”
Arty wrote " there is no "separation of church and state" in the Constitution." You are either being disingenuous or are truly ignorant.
Yes, those words are not in the constitution. Thomas Jefferson first used those words when describing the intent of the first amendment to a group of baptists concerned about their religious freedom since they were a minority denomination. In addition, the main author of the Constitution, James Madison, wrote several documents asserting that the separation of church and state were conceptually what the establishment clause established.
Just because those words aren't there doesn't mean that isn't it's intent. Also, the legislative branch didn't make laws that require public schools to not include religious content, the judicial branch made a decision that did. The decision regarding school prayer was made by the Supreme Court, and has been upheld several times. The Constitution clearly establishes that the Supreme Court is intended to be the final arbiters of the meaning of the constitution. Therefore, your statement that "[i]t's about time we get back to Constitutional basics and quit making law in the Legislative branch" is just wrong. Nothing about this has to do with the legislative branch changing the constitution. The legislative branch's job IS to make laws, but those laws must be consistent with the constitution, and the SCOTUS determines whether they are or not.
Thank you Mickie, that was 3 Jesus Christs in 3 sentences. Thats 3 too many Jesus's for me. I am sure they would feed anyone who was hungry regardless of religion but at the end of the day they are still pushing a Baptist agenda.
Factoryconnection, why thats brilliant! They should start a organization called the Lowcountry food bank here in the Chuck. One with no religious association, agenda or mission except feeding over 200,000 families, children and seniors in need each year across coastal SC. See y'all February 22 at the 16th annual Chefs Feast.
Sorry, factoryconnection, I'm freelance. I'm allowed to take the easy ones just like anyone else.
From the OFBC website describing the church
Old Fort is a church where everyone has an opportunity to know, serve and worship Jesus Christ.
Old Fort Baptist is a dynamic, evangelistic and mission-minded congregation with many ministries through which we proclaim Jesus Christ in our community, across our nation and around our world.
Article II OFBC Constitution:
"The purpose of this church shall be to foster and maintain public worship of Jesus Christ, to carry out His great commission, and to promote Christian fellowship and growth among its members."
since they describe themselves as an evangelistic mission-minded congregation I do not see how you can separate the two. The church was raising money for its "missions" which in their own words are used to proclaim jesus Christ in our community, across our nation and around our world.
Jonathan. The note sent home to parents CLEARLY indicated that MONEY was to be raised to support the church's MISSIONS. Nothing in the use of the word 'missions' can be misunderstood by anyone living in SC and who knows anything about the Baptist church. By definition the 'mission' of a Baptist church does not have a secular purpose. The reason the school's lawyer advised the school to STOP was simply because it was a CLEAR violation of the Lemon Test. They didn't stop the activity in order to please the Humanists.
Powered by Foundation
© Copyright 2017,
Charleston City Paper