Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

    • All
    • Today
    • Last 7 Days
    • Last 30 Days
    • Select a Date Range

Comment Archives: Stories: News+Opinion: Stegelin's Cartoons

Re: “Stegelin: Hearing crickets on Denzel Curnell

We all have theories or opinions of what truly happened. This is my belief; the Army did not disclose the true reason why they discharged Denzel Curnell. What I am about to say could concern both parties involved in this sad tragedy. Family members think closely of Denzel's past, did he ever receive any traumatic head injuries, did he have problems with learning, fantasying or understanding. I believe SLED should also study the police officer's background to rule out any hidden descriptors. There are millions upon millions walking throughout the world with hidden traumatic brain injuries, the truth, no one notices a brain injury because they become accustomed to a person's actions or do not wish to be involved. Why did Denzel have a gun and why was he wearing a hoodie? I believe his mind lived in a fantasy world; we all fantasize sometime within our life span and some with traumatic brain injuries never reach a period of real reality. Sadly, addictions and brain injuries power everyday fantasies that eventually become a true reality within the believers mind; drugs, prescriptions that are legal or illegal also destroy the human mind. I have faith the TRUTH will prevail in time.

0 of 3 people like this.
Posted by Robert Durland on July 2, 2014 at 7:43 PM

Re: “Stegelin: Give the job nobody wants to the Democrat

When Governor Haley resigns to run for POTUS or VPOTUS in 2016 like her idol, that LTGov seat is going to seem pretty darn important all of a sudden.

2 of 2 people like this.
Posted by factoryconnection on June 26, 2014 at 10:52 AM

Re: “Stegelin: Give the job nobody wants to the Democrat

What idiots decided the role if Lt. Governor should be bi-partisan is beyond me. In the White House, the comparable position is also held by a Democrat, but for an all together different reason. I still feel the head of government should be comprised of three co-presidents thus ensuring the widest possible representation of the people, and the impossibility of a split vote.

0 of 4 people like this.
Posted by Streetlaw on June 25, 2014 at 7:11 PM

Re: “Stegelin: Of beer and beards at Charleston Southern

Stegelin, on the other hand, deserves the Pulitzer.

2 of 5 people like this.
Posted by Streetlaw on June 11, 2014 at 12:49 PM

Re: “Stegelin: Of beer and beards at Charleston Southern

CSU's actions must be unconstitutional.

2 of 5 people like this.
Posted by Streetlaw on June 11, 2014 at 12:48 PM

Re: “Stegelin: Joe Riley's curfew

Even thought the ordinance is only pertaining to "new establishments" it does not specify when the date for a "new establishment" begins. It also opens the door for down the road when a "new establishment" is forced to close at midnight and existing establishments are able to stay open, it will create turmoil within the industry and the city will implement a fair ordinance that will require new & old establishments to close early. If you speak to any of the owners of these existing establishments you will see that they are clearly opposed to this current city ordinance.

I can assure you San Francisco will take the Conde Nast #1 Spot if this ordinance passes.

4 of 4 people like this.
Posted by bh74850 on June 5, 2014 at 3:13 PM

Re: “Stegelin: Joe Riley's curfew

as far as i know the rule only applies for new bars,if i'm incorrect let me know, so the existing one will have a captive audience and will make even more moolaa. especially since they can even sell their establishment with the right to be open till2 for a real premium,even more bucks hooray for a slick way to limit the competition

1 of 2 people like this.
Posted by John Byram on June 5, 2014 at 1:08 PM

Re: “Stegelin: Joe Riley's curfew

Thank goodness someone is acknowledging this. The P&C is only promoting the ordinance with disgraceful journalism about local people who have been arrested on King/Meeting for simply walking.

7 of 7 people like this.
Posted by Kate Delipoglou on June 4, 2014 at 11:45 AM

Re: “Stegelin: It's not you, it's GOP

"We're not discriminating against you any more, we have moved on to other people" is not a positive spin no matter how you try.

0 of 1 people like this.
Posted by John Clary on May 15, 2014 at 2:01 PM

Re: “Stegelin: It's not you, it's GOP

Did you notice the NAACP label disappears in the second panel?

1 of 3 people like this.
Posted by Streetlaw on May 14, 2014 at 6:27 PM

Re: “Stegelin: CofC unveils new required curriculum

Your biased rag is pure body waste. Take me off your list.

2 of 11 people like this.
Posted by Jim Makeever on April 24, 2014 at 9:36 AM

Re: “Stegelin: CofC unveils new required curriculum

Bahahaha!

3 of 6 people like this.
Posted by Streetlaw on April 23, 2014 at 7:32 PM

Re: “Stegelin: Changing scenery at CofC

Ursus, uh-huh suuuurrrrre. Thats why instead of the flag, he distributed and carried the sauce in his stores until 2009 when he closed. Making sure the nasty old bigot had some money in his old age. Nothing says "Free Speech" like barbeque sauce. Are you angling for Ned Hills position - because you are def in the running?
Stegelin- funny comic and pretty close to fact.

2 of 2 people like this.
Posted by CIACulinaryKid on April 8, 2014 at 1:14 PM

Re: “Stegelin: Changing scenery at CofC

@culinarykid Do you think you're 'breaking news' about Maurice? Smart people know that was about the defense of Free Speech.

@ city paper A couple of stick men would be better than these adolescent 'comics' that y'all print from this guy. I have some advice for the 'artist'.

http://new.artinstitutes.edu/

1 of 5 people like this.
Posted by ursus on April 6, 2014 at 9:48 AM

Re: “Stegelin: Changing scenery at CofC

@dp4 and assuming that your assertion (which is based on... what, exactly?) is true, wtf kind of difference would that make to anything at all?

The past several presidents have been conservative, most (if not all) the potential candidates were conservative, and the expectation was always that the eventual hire was going to be conservative.

How long have you been in South Carolina? This was never a quest to get a liberal leader in place - that just doesn't happen here, if you're new to the state, so you can get off the 'help help we're being oppressed' train. That one hasn't actually run in this state... ever... for conservative white dudes.

5 of 5 people like this.
Posted by HappyPessimist on April 4, 2014 at 12:21 PM

Re: “Stegelin: Changing scenery at CofC

The fact that CofC is a liberal arts school is irrelevant in relation to the fact that many, if not most of the faculty, administrators and student population are liberal thinking in their political views. That fact is undeniable.

0 of 6 people like this.
Posted by dp4 on April 4, 2014 at 11:52 AM

Re: “Stegelin: Changing scenery at CofC

Stegelin, pretty accurate. Y'all left out that bottle of his good buddy Maurice Bessinger's barbeque sauce he probably was carrying. His store sure stocked enough of it to last a lifetime.

9 of 9 people like this.
Posted by CIACulinaryKid on April 3, 2014 at 9:18 PM

Re: “Stegelin: Changing scenery at CofC

The funny thing is many, many conservatives think the "liberal" in "liberal arts" ACTUALLY DOES EXACTLY mean "progressive-liberal-US political doctrine" rather than the "classical arts" use of the term.

I wonder what would would happen if we told them about how their current political ideology is rooted in what political scientists and economists call "classical liberalism" ... we'd see some heads explode.

12 of 14 people like this.
Posted by John Curtis on April 3, 2014 at 10:09 AM

Re: “Stegelin: Political ads that scream the obvious

Wasn't the 10th amendment basically overturned by the 14th and 17th? Because I'm thinking that there were a whole lot of things that couldn't be done after those that could be done before (like slavery as the largest example).

0 of 2 people like this.
Posted by John Clary on March 12, 2014 at 6:26 PM

Re: “Stegelin: Political ads that scream the obvious

All political ads are for someone or against someone. The discerning voter will research who is on their side and who isn't! Political yahoos cry loss of freedom, supporting the Constitution, 2nd, 4th and 10th Amendment, limiting government intrusion, free enterprise to help strengthen families. So tell me how interfering with a woman right to choose what will happen to her body will strengthen families? How will repeated blocking of voter access improve freedoms? Will performing background checks on gun buyers inhibit their ability to get guns? Who should have authority to intervene when polluters damage rivers and waterways, grounds, soils and backyards? Should the state and federal government have some say over Big Oil, Gas and Coal and hold them liable for any damages incurred? How will communities get rectification without state or federal governmental intervention to control the mega-corporations when they create instances like Love Canal, the Brio Site, the BP spill in the Gulf of Mexico, the Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska, the coal chemical spilled into the Elk River in West Virginia and the 2013 Mayflower oil spill occurred on March 29, 2013, when an ExxonMobil pipeline carrying Canadian Wabasca heavy crude from the Athabasca oil sands ruptured in Mayflower, Arkansas, about 25 miles northwest of Little Rock? What recourse does the average person on the street have against huge corporations who have mega-dollar lawyers and accountants on their side? What could go wrong?

2 of 5 people like this.
Posted by radsenior on March 12, 2014 at 4:02 PM
Classified Listings
Most Viewed

Powered by Foundation   © Copyright 2015, Charleston City Paper   RSS