Julian likes to quote the SCSC ruling...laughable. Here are some more quotes from the ruling:
It is undisputed that Mother and Father did not live together prior to the baby's birth and that Father did not support Mother financially for pregnancy related expenses, even though he had the ability to provide some degree of financial assistance to Mother.
I cannot fathom that Congress intended ICWA to require the return of a child to a parent who consistently, by his words and actions, evinced a desire to forego his responsibilities as a father.
My review of the record convinces me that Father turned his back on the joys and responsibilities of fatherhood at every turn. I would not minimize, as the majority does, the telling fact that Father told Mother in writing after Baby Girl's birth that he would relinquish his parental rights rather than support her and Baby Girl, and I do not join the majority in accepting his laughable explanation that he did this as a way to convince Mother to marry him.
Julian Winnfield; firstly, we know you're not a real person, and your Facebook account is for trolling purposes. The sperm donor did sign away his rights to contest adoption, but that's a moot point. Dusten was not supportive of the pregnancy and didn't want this kid. I have suspicions that his parents wanted custody of little V more than he did, and pushed him to abuse ICWA to get her back.
ICWA is a disgusting racist law that does not take into account the fact that these children have other heritage too that is not being represented. ICWA supporters seem to gloss over that fact and never attempt to debate this in their responses. Racists.
Romada, you're way behind the curve here, you have a lot of research to do to keep up with the rest of us. Dusten was completely unsupportive of his pregnant girlfriend; I don't blame her one bit for wanting to keep him away from the hospital.
Paula, as I'm sure you know from the SCSC ruling (you have read it, right?) Dusten never played a positive supporting role prior to the birth. He was an absentee sperm donor, nothing more. The fact that he abused a law to get back a little girl he didn't want who has only 1% Cherokee heritage is disgusting.
What about the child's hispanic heritage? Frankly, you are a racist person if you think this is ok.
As usual, the pro-child abuse crowd has surfaced to make their uneducated opinion known. Misuse of ICWA has resulted in kids being harmed, and even killed. You won't hear the pro-ICWA crowd ever comment on those cases. The leading pro-child abuse organization NICWA even deletes all such articles from their Facebook page, putting blinders on and turning their backs on these kids.
There are some despicable people who surface whenever a new article about this case comes up; if I were Native American I would be utterly ashamed by how my culture is being represented by such ignorant people.
Cante, you're an ignorant person.
It was in the South Carolina Supreme court ruling the father NEVER gave up parental rights, these rights where never terminated. The paps knew Veronica's father was a member of the Cherokee nation and tried to avoid a law to illegally steal another man's child a man who is raising a daughter with his ex who is fully supporting him. His older daughter loves him and her little sister and said in an interview she was scared of loosing her.
Anyone thinking he had to give his consent to the adoption is wrong. If you think he would have wanted this child had he known about the adoption you are wrong. He wanted no part of her life nor any financial responsibility. The minute he signed that contract with the mother his rights ended. Period. It's basic contract law. And common sense. Family court and the SCSC only gave Brown custody because of that asinine law. Yes the judge brought up the contract, but he was clearly posturing to solidify the courts split decision. Make no mistake, if it were not for that asinine federal law this little girl would be where she belongs - with her adoptive parents.
Very simply this case is over as far as South Carolina is concerned. They have ruled that Dusten Brown is the legal and only father of Veronica. That means it is up to him who sees or talks to his child. To call every week for months seemed a bit like stalking, how did they have the number and address should not have all of that gone thru the lawyer. Plus even the man who wrote this law said it works when it is followed as seen here it was not followed. Errors were made on both sides.
Bio mom cut of contact with Dusten did not tell him when she went into labor and that she had chosen adoption for their baby. How could he be there when he was not told she was in labor. And as much as the C's love this child she is NOT their daughter.
Filing with SCOTUS is their right as citizens of US. The odds are really not in their favor that the court will even hear this case.
This articles has skipped many of the facts and really has only shown one side. Dusten Brown has kept him and his daughter out of media and that is his right. The SC Supreme Court has said it all: Father did not consent. They never even asked him to sign a TPR. As I said mistakes were made on both sides and signing something in error should not mean that you lose your child!
And just because this article says she was adopted does not make it true. They are not nor have they ever been her legal parents. As has been said the adoption was never final. Dusten stopped that from happening and fought for his daughter. And insulting her father and their heritage is really in bad taste and that has been SVR stance from the beginning. They have dragged Dusten down just because he had the nerve to ask to parent his own daughter!
Also Julian(MJW), you claiming that "Tell you what...you people stop stealing our children and I'll stop being hateful...deal?" statement that you made is just asinine of you. YOU are NOT my children's father or even remotely related to them (thank god). So just who do YOU think you are? My husband and myself (both of NA decent) will be the ONLY ones making a decision regarding our children (all of whom are enrolled members).
Without addressing anything else in your entire comment, let me just say this about the next to the last sentence:
That is not your call. It isn't their call. It isn't my call. The decision about who his daughter has contact with and ANYTHING else which concerns her is HIS decision and NOBODY else's...PERIOD. Would you want anyone else making decisions concerning your child? I wouldn't want that either. I don't think any of us would. She is his daughter. She is home where she belongs. He loves her and she loves him. Leave them alone.
The story of this family's loss reminds me to savor every moment of my child's life. Every tantrumy, homework-struggling, exhausting moment that all of us parents go through. Hug your kids tight and be glad they are home with you.
Dear Julian, That my dear is like calling the kettle BLACK since I am NA, and you referring to "white people" as "you people". You my dear are not even intelligent enough to distinguish individual people, you just lump them all in to one category of "you people". Not knowing who you are referring to. And your RACIST, THREATENING AND BELITTLING attitude is exactly why many people look down on us NA, it's people like you who give NA bad names. And by the way Julian (Michael J Winterfeldt), you don't even want to go there.
BAD KARMA. Dusten Brown - whether he has the right to parent Veronica (Ronnie Brown) Capobianco or not - is behaving in very bad faith. Cutting off his daughter from the only parents she has known since birth reeks of his vengeful spirit. Dusten Brown's lawyer and her cruelty towards the couple is absolutely mind-boggling. He should have been a FATHER then, and realized the Capobiancos are now a part of his life, his and his daughter's. He has to know they will fight him all the way to SCOTUS, especially when he has poured out so much hatred and cruelty towards this couple. They love his daughter! They have loved her from the moment of her birth. Just look at these pictures of Matt and Melanie, how much they have changed over the past year. They are suffering profoundly. Dusten Brown and his lawyer have lost their humanity by not extending their compassion and respect and GRATITUDE to this family. Whether or not they win in court, the Capobiancos should remain a part of Veronica's life. Veronica deserves that most of all.
Add that to the one you made about my "Indian name" being "one without guts", and it looks more like you're the one who isn't so nice, doesn't it?
That's the kind of comment you elicit when you make a racist comment like the one you made which preceded mine. You telling a Native American to "go sit in your tent" is about like telling an African American to go eat some fried chicken and watermelon. If you don't like my response to your bigotry, don't make racial slurs.
You are incorrect in practically every single thing you stated. (1) He DID have to consent to the adoption, in order for it to be legal. (2) He did NOT voluntarily surrender his parental rights, and any assertion to the contrary is incorrect, and needs to be supported by evidence if you are going to continue to assert it. (3) The law is NOT a "bad law" (Is that a legal term?) and you obviously have no understanding of its purposes if that is your assertion. (4) The judge was not "wrong". The THREE Justices of the Supreme Court of South Carolina correctly ruled to uphold the law in this situation and to protect the rights of the child, the father, the Cherokee Nation, and their respective relationships. (The only parties who legally have any rights in this situation.)
Please provide any evidence whatsoever which clearly supports ANY of your assertions, because so far all you have stated has been your uninformed, incorrect, and biased opinions, which are glazed over with your stupidity. You're very vocal for someone who doesn't have a fucking clue what he's talking about...a very bad combination...as you, and everyone else, will see if you continue to engage me on this issue, and with no more facts or intelligence than you have. Do yourself a favor...go back to the drunk hillbilly discussion board...before I REALLY help you to make yourself look stupid.
Ned Hill...trying to "reason" with someone like Julian Winnfield aka James Latimer aka Billy Bud and aka about 10 other fake profile (by his own admission) "I've got about ten different FB accounts, each one of them just as fake as all of the the others", is impossible. He is a very bitter person who thinks everyone is an "idiot" (as he is forever claiming) also he admits that he either is a abuser of women or a supporter of abusing women...in his own words
Julian Winnfield Tammy Herman :
"Actually, my Indian name is kinda long. It's "SLAP A RACIST B*TCH IF SHE SAID IT TO MY FACE". That's a loose translation, but you get the idea. I would never hit any woman, but I'd consider making an exception for you". Yeah, so really NOTHING he has to say is really of any important to ANYONE, but his own little ego (sarcasm intended).
Don't forget this part Julian, “We do not take lightly the grave interests at stake in this case. However, we are constrained by the law and convinced by the facts that the transfer of custody to Father was required under the law. Adoptive Couple are ideal parents who have exhibited the ability provide a loving family environment for Baby Girl. Thus, it is with a heavy heart that we affirm the family court order.”
If it weren't for the ICWA this child would still be in South Carolina. The biological father got special treatment because he has some Cherokee blood. His actions leading up to, and following the birth were enough to terminate his rights under SC law.
Sorry everyone but had the bio mom been honest and tell the dad WHERE his baby was going, this would never have happened. Why didn't she tell him that she found a suitable home for their daughter? Because she is a sneaky biotch that's why! They were NOT married, he was not responsible for her, only the child. The adoption was NEVER final. The media has done a fabulous job painting this sad picture of two unsuspecting parents raising their 'adopted' daughter, when all of a sudden, 2 years later this man shows up to reclaim his daughter. Not the case. Veronica is home.
Powered by Foundation
© Copyright 2013,
Charleston City Paper